Author:
Fleming David E.,Hawes Jon M.
Abstract
Purpose
Given the ever-increasing complexity of business-to-business exchange, success is contingent on being able to adapt to any given situation. However, there is little in the way of guidance for how to adapt when it comes to negotiations. This paper aims to help business and industrial marketing professionals “get it right” by introducing a new tool which can be used to determine the appropriateness of using a distributive or an integrative approach for a given negotiation interaction.
Design/methodology/approach
To develop this tool, the authors identify key situational factors in the negotiating context that serve as indicators of the appropriate orientation (integrative or distributive) that should be applied based on the extant negotiation literature. From this, they develop a framework to guide negotiators in their selection of an orientation for a particular interaction to achieve the best possible outcome.
Findings
The tool developed from the literature review and termed the “Negotiation Scorecard” enables business-to-business marketers to better gauge the negotiation context and develop an interaction style consistent with that situation. This can lead to better deals and/or enhanced long-term relationships within business and industrial marketing channels.
Originality/value
This tool is the first of its kind to provide negotiators with a structured and quantifiable metric to guide their planning for future negotiation interactions and offers proscriptive guidance as to the types of strategies and tactics they should plan to use and that they should expect to encounter.
Subject
Marketing,Business and International Management
Reference36 articles.
1. Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation;Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1998
2. Modeling distributive and integrative negotiations;Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,1995
3. Two integrative win-win negotiating strategies;Simulation & Gaming,1996
4. Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiations;Journal of Conflict Resolution,1987
5. Culture, intercultural communication competence, and sales negotiation: a qualitative research approach;Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,2004
Cited by
27 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献