The position of relationship based practice in youth justice

Author:

Creaney Sean

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the position of relationship-based practice in youth justice by looking at how “effective programmes” seem to have been given heightened importance over “effective” young person-worker relationships. Design/methodology/approach – By critically reviewing the literature on the topic, the paper promotes debate on the position of relationship-based practice in youth justice. Findings – It is argued that the young person-worker relationship is very important. A genuine and empathetic relationship can reduce the chances of re-offending and improve the child's personal, social and emotional development. By being respectful and listening attentively to children's “life stories”, barriers can be overcome, potentially resulting in lifestyle, social and behavioural change. However, although there is evidence that developing a trusting relationship is “effective” and that it is a key component of effective practice, what is less clear is how to practically secure the engagement of a child. Originality/value – In comparison to the emphasis on effective programme intervention, there has been less research done on the “characteristics” of effective staff practice in youth justice.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Community and Home Care,Law,Safety Research

Reference43 articles.

1. Baker, K. , Kelly, G. and Wilkinson, B. (2011), Assessment in Youth Justice, The Policy Press, Bristol.

2. Barry, M. (2009), “Promoting desistance amongst young people”, in Taylor, T. , Earle, R. and Hester, R. (Eds), Youth Justice Handbook: Theory Policy and Practice, Willan Publishing, Cullompton, pp. 158-67.

3. Batchelor, S. and McNeill, F. (2005), “The young person-worker relationship”, in Bateman, T. and Pitts, J. (Eds), The RHP Companion to Youth Justice, Russell House Publishing, Lyme Regis, pp. 166-71.

4. Bateman, T. and Pitts, J. (2005), The RHP Companion to Youth Justice, Russell House, Lyme Regis.

5. Beyond Youth Custody (2014), “Young people and resettlement: participatory approaches a practitioner's guide”, available at: www.beyondyouthcustody.net/wp-content/uploads/Participatory-approaches-for-young-people-in-resettlement-a-practitioner%E2%80%99s-guide.pdf (accessed 16 May 2014).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3