Income generation in public libraries: potentials and pitfalls

Author:

Pautz Hartwig

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to discuss the literature on income generation methods in the context of the “public library ethos”. As public libraries are struggling with cuts to public spending almost everywhere, the topic of “income generation” to supplement public funding is highly relevant. Design/methodology/approach – The article is a review of existing literature about income generation methods and public library ethos. Findings – The literature review reports on a large variety of income generation methods – some of them are country-specific and only applicable in particular political, legal and cultural environments, others could be applied by librarians across borders. The review makes clear that income generation is difficult and requires skill. It also clearly outlines the potential incompatibilities between some income generation methods and the public library ethos. Practical implications – The article raises important issues with regards to how practitioners should go about funding existing or new services. It becomes clear that librarians need a clear ethical position regarding how services can be provided and under which conditions services cannot be provided on the basis of principled reasoning. Originality/value – A broad range of literature on income generation and public library ethos from various countries is reviewed and questions regarding how public librarians, on a practical level, can improve their institutions’ funding situation are discussed. This praxis-oriented discussion is connected to important ethical considerations that should come into play when devising an income generation strategy.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference73 articles.

1. Aalto, M. and Knight, T. (1999), International Network of Public Libraries. Fundraising: Alternative Financial Support for Public Library Services, Scarecrow Press, London.

2. ALA (American Library Association) (1996), “Library bill of rights”, available at: www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/librarybill (accessed 6 July 2013).

3. ALA (American Library Association) (2008), “Code of ethics of the American Library Association”, available at: www.ala.org/advocacy/sites/ala.org.advocacy/files/content/proethics/codeofethics/Code%20of%20Ethics%20of%20the%20American%20Library%20Association.pdf (accessed 25 June 2013).

4. ALA (American Library Association) (2012), “The 2012 state of America’s libraries: a report from the American Library Association”, American Libraries: The Magazine of the American Library Association, available at: www.ala.org/news/sites/ala.org.news/files/content/StateofAmericasLibrariesReport2012Finalwithcover.pdf (accessed 16 June 2013).

5. Ashman, A.B. (2002), “A comparative examination of public library fundraising”, Public Library Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 47-57.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3