Abstract
Purpose
– While the primary importance of citation searching continues to be connecting researchers to highly-related literature, additional uses for the data have developed. For example, academic institutions frequently recommend that faculty include a citation analysis in their tenure and promotion (t & p) dossiers as a way of demonstrating the value of their research. Due to the limited number of tools available for this type of analysis in the past, Librarians were unable to help faculty create an exhaustive accounting of citations to their work. The aim of this paper is to provide examples of the growing number of tools that now exist to assist librarians and faculty in locating citation information for t & p dossiers.
Design/methodology/approach
– An in-depth survey of both free and subscription resources to identify those that offered options for citation searching was conducted.
Findings
– Commercial vendors, organizations and researchers are developing a wide variety of tools that help track the impact of a faculty member's research.
Research limitations/implications
– The list of resources surveyed is not comprehensive. The research was focused on those available, and most relevant to the author's institution.
Practical implications
– Based on the results of this investigation, a web page was created to help direct faculty and librarians to a large number of resources for citation searching (available at: http://libresources.wichita.edu/citationsearching).
Originality/value
– Librarians have prepared numerous web guides to assist faculty in conducting citation searches. Few offer links to as wide a variety of resources as this research presents.
Subject
Library and Information Sciences
Reference31 articles.
1. Andersen, H.
(2000), “Influence and reputation in the social sciences: how much do researchers agree?”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 56 No. 6, pp. 674-692.
2. Bence, V.
and
Oppenheim, C.
(2004), “The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 347-368.
3. Cameron, B.D.
(2005), “Trends in the usage of ISI bibliometric data: uses, abuses, and implications”, portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 105-125.
4. Elsevier BV
(2011), “SciVerse Scopus: content coverage guide”, available at: www.info.sciverse.com/UserFiles/sciverse _scopus_content_coverage_0.pdf (accessed 21 December 2012).
5. Fleischman, J.
(2013), “Scientific insurgents say journal impact factors distort science”, The ASCB Post, available at: www.ascb.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1059&Itemid=402 (accessed 24 June 2013).
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献