Citation searching for tenure and promotion: an overview of issues and tools

Author:

Dagenais Brown Janet

Abstract

Purpose – While the primary importance of citation searching continues to be connecting researchers to highly-related literature, additional uses for the data have developed. For example, academic institutions frequently recommend that faculty include a citation analysis in their tenure and promotion (t & p) dossiers as a way of demonstrating the value of their research. Due to the limited number of tools available for this type of analysis in the past, Librarians were unable to help faculty create an exhaustive accounting of citations to their work. The aim of this paper is to provide examples of the growing number of tools that now exist to assist librarians and faculty in locating citation information for t & p dossiers. Design/methodology/approach – An in-depth survey of both free and subscription resources to identify those that offered options for citation searching was conducted. Findings – Commercial vendors, organizations and researchers are developing a wide variety of tools that help track the impact of a faculty member's research. Research limitations/implications – The list of resources surveyed is not comprehensive. The research was focused on those available, and most relevant to the author's institution. Practical implications – Based on the results of this investigation, a web page was created to help direct faculty and librarians to a large number of resources for citation searching (available at: http://libresources.wichita.edu/citationsearching). Originality/value – Librarians have prepared numerous web guides to assist faculty in conducting citation searches. Few offer links to as wide a variety of resources as this research presents.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference31 articles.

1. Andersen, H. (2000), “Influence and reputation in the social sciences: how much do researchers agree?”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 56 No. 6, pp. 674-692.

2. Bence, V. and Oppenheim, C. (2004), “The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise”, Journal of Information Science, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 347-368.

3. Cameron, B.D. (2005), “Trends in the usage of ISI bibliometric data: uses, abuses, and implications”, portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 105-125.

4. Elsevier BV (2011), “SciVerse Scopus: content coverage guide”, available at: www.info.sciverse.com/UserFiles/sciverse _scopus_content_coverage_0.pdf (accessed 21 December 2012).

5. Fleischman, J. (2013), “Scientific insurgents say journal impact factors distort science”, The ASCB Post, available at: www.ascb.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1059&Itemid=402 (accessed 24 June 2013).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3