The potential of feminist technoscience for advancing research in information practice

Author:

Costello Kaitlin LightORCID,Floegel DianaORCID

Abstract

PurposeIn this paper, we introduce feminist technoscience as an approach that will advance theory in information behavior and practice.Design/methodology/approachIn this conceptual paper, we identify four common assumptions in information behavior and information practice research that limit theory development to date. Existing models and theories tend to rely on extractive logic, focus on a person-in-situation, depend on binary definitions and assume that information interaction changes people's lives for the better. This leads to extractive ways of discussing information interactions and limits our ability to fully theorize embodiment and affect in our discipline.FindingsFeminist technoscience offers distinct ways of thinking about people, technology, bodies and power; in doing so, it responds to some perennial limitations in our research to date.Originality/valueFeminist technoscience is a robust research paradigm that has not yet been fully applied in our discipline. Assumptions in information behavior and information practice research have led to models and theories that reflect a logic of extraction and are limited in their potential for characterizing both embodiment and affect. Feminist technoscience provides a way to conduct research that challenges these assumptions and addresses these limitations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems

Reference65 articles.

1. Affective economies;Social Text,2004

2. Anderson, W. and Adams, V. (2016), “Pramoedya's chickens: postcolonial studies of technoscience”, in Felt, U., Fouche, R., Miller, C.A. and Smith-Doerr, L. (Eds), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 4th ed., The MIT Press, pp. 181-209.

3. Feminist technoscience studies;European Journal of Women's Studies,2010

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Examining information needs of public data service users: a study based on the ‘Message Board for Leaders of People’s Daily in China’;Information Research an international electronic journal;2024-06-18

2. Isolated, individualised, and immobilised: information behaviour in the context of academic casualisation;Information Research an international electronic journal;2024-06-18

3. Information from sound: exploring sounds and listening in information practices research;Information Research an international electronic journal;2024-06-18

4. Transdisciplinarity: an imperative for information behaviour research;Information Research an international electronic journal;2024-06-18

5. Approaches to Exploring the Information Worlds of Women Engineering Students;Communications in Computer and Information Science;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3