KMS re-contextualization – recognizing learnings from OMIS research

Author:

Mühlburger Manuel,Oppl Stefan,Stary Christian

Abstract

Purpose Deployment of knowledge management systems (KMSs) suffers from low adoption in organizational reality that is attributed to a lack of perceivable added value for people in actual work situations. Poor task/technology fit in the process of knowledge retrieval appears to be a major factor influencing this issue. Existing research indicates a lack of re-contextualizing stored information provided by KMSs in a particular situation. Existing research in the area of organizational memory information systems (OMISs) has thoroughly examined and widely discussed the topic of re-contextualization. The purpose of this paper, thus, is to examine how KMS design can benefit from OMIS research on approaches for re-contextualization in knowledge retrieval. Design/methodology/approach This paper examines OMIS literature and inductively derives a categorization scheme for KMS according to their strategy of re-contextualizing knowledge. The authors have validated the scheme validated in a multiple case study that examines the differentiatory value of the scheme for approaches with various re-contextualization strategies. Findings The classification scheme allows a step-by-step selection of approaches for re-contextualization of information in KMS design and development derived from OMIS research. The case study has demonstrated the applicability of the developed scheme and shows that the differentiation criteria can be applied unambiguously. Research limitations/implications Because of the chosen case study approach for validation, the validation results may lack generalizability. Practical implications The scheme enables an informed selection of KMSs appropriate for a particular OMIS use case, as the scheme’s attributes serve as design rationale for a certain architecture or constellation of components. Developers can not only select from various approaches when designing re-contextualizaton but also come up with rationales for each candidate because of structured representation. Hence, stakeholders can be supported in a more informed way and design KMSs more effectively along organizational change processes. Originality/value The paper addresses an identified need for systematic characterization of KMS approaches and systems intending to meet the objectives of OMISs. As such, it allows streamlining further research in this field, as approaches can be judged according to their originality and positioned relative to each other.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Library and Information Sciences,Computer Networks and Communications,Computer Science Applications,Information Systems

Reference50 articles.

1. Corporate memories for knowledge management in industrial practice: prospects and challenges;Journal of Universal Computer Science,1997

2. Toward a technology for organizational memories;IEEE Intelligent Systems,1998

3. Context-aware, proactive delivery of task-specific information: the knowmore project;Information Systems Frontiers,2000

4. Organizational memory: processes, boundary objects, and trajectories,1999

5. Organizational memory as objects, processes, and trajectories: an examination of organizational memory in use;Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW),2004

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Connectivity between Electronic Services, Taxpayers’ Support and Tax Administration Performance;Journal of Information & Knowledge Management;2024-01-19

2. Systematic Literature Review Knowledge Reuse in Software Development;2021 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (IC2SE);2021-11-16

3. Mathematical Dynamic Representation of the Energy Conversion System for DFIG Wind Turbines;2021 International Conference on Computer Science and Engineering (IC2SE);2021-11-16

4. Stagewise Overview of Issues Influencing Organizational Technology Adoption and Use;Frontiers in Psychology;2021-03-17

5. A structured literature review of scientometric research of the knowledge management discipline: a 2021 update;Journal of Knowledge Management;2021-02-08

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3