Social engagement and healthy ageing in disadvantaged communities
Author:
Beech Roger,Murray Michael
Abstract
PurposeSocial engagement is important for healthy ageing but may be challenging for residents of disadvantaged urban communities. For older residents of one such community, this project aimed to examine levels of social engagement and its link with wellbeing and community attachment.Design/methodology/approachThe project introduced activities to promote social engagement and used a survey to assess participants' wider involvement in local activities and their feelings of wellbeing and community attachment.FindingsSixty five people completed the survey: most lived alone (over 69 per cent) but had contact at least monthly with family, friends and neighbours (over 70 per cent) and made regular use of local amenities (over 79 per cent). Only 34.7 per cent were classified as “not lonely” and participants' mean health related quality of life score was lower than the national average. However, over 65 per cent of participants rated their generic quality of life as good or better and over 67 per cent had a positive sense of community attachment. Statistically significant associations were identified between a person's feelings of loneliness and generic quality of life and their level of contact with relatives, neighbours and friends and their sense of community attachment.Originality/valueResults confirm the need for strategies to promote the social engagement of older people. The link between community attachment and wellbeing also demonstrates that community wide strategies are required. The importance of maintaining the “corner shop” was evident.
Subject
Care Planning,Community and Home Care,Gerontology
Reference34 articles.
1. Allpass, F., Towers, A., Stephens, C., Fitzgerald, E., Stevenson, B. and Davey, S. (2007), “Independence, well being and social participation in an aging population”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1114, pp. 241‐50. 2. Barnes, M., Blom, A., Cox, A. and Lessof, C. (2006), The Social Exclusion of Older People: Evidence from the First Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London. 3. Baum, F. and Palmer, C. (2002), “‘Opportunity structures’: urban landscape, social capital and health promotion in Australia”, Health Promotion International, Vol. 17, pp. 351‐61. 4. Beech, R. (2005), “Evidence of the effectiveness of intermediate care”, in Roe, B. and Beech, R. (Eds), Intermediate and Continuing Care: Policy and Practice, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 19‐32. 5. Beech, R., Russell, W., Little, R. and Sherlow, S. (2004), “An evaluation of a multidisciplinary team for intermediate care at home”, International Journal of Integrated Care, 4 October, available at: www.ijic.org/index.php/ijic/article/view/113/226 (accessed 30 September 2011).
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|