From the centralized national collection policy towards a decentralized collection management and resource sharing co-operation – Finnish experiences

Author:

Muhonen Ari,Saarti Jarmo,Vattulainen Pentti

Abstract

Purpose – Finland had a legislation-based centralized collection policy until the mid-1990s. The main components were national resource centers (selected higher education libraries) and provincial libraries (selected public libraries). This paradigm changed during the recession of the 1990s when new public management ideologies were adopted by the government. This ended the centralized model and a new policy favoring a decentralized collection management which demanded resource sharing. The models designated for the print-only age became obsolete also when the digital dissemination of especially scientific documents began to be the norm. The Finnish libraries have started to implement a new strategy consisting of different elements including a new model of library automation systems, the National Repository which is the hub for the resource sharing of print materials, digitization projects (to be especially implemented by the National Library) and with new policies defining the roles and responsibilities of each of the libraries involved. This article aims to describe the history of the Finnish centralized collection policy, its shift to the modern management of the collection as well as the philosophy and tools used in this work. Design/methodology/approach – The paper describes the evolution of the Finnish national collection policy and its main trends. Findings – The National Repository Library has enabled Finnish university libraries to focus their collection policies and to make savings in the cost of premises. A new business model for the digital era is needed for document sharing between libraries. Research limitations/implications – The paper is based on Finnish experiences. Practical implications – Models for national and international collection and preservation policies are presented. Originality/value – The paper provides proposals for the building of global division of work in the long-tail management of documents.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference17 articles.

1. Anderson, C. (2006), The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More, Hyperion, New York, NY.

2. Di Tillio, C. (2004), “Report on the 2nd International Conference on Repository Libraries: preserving and maintaining availability of print material. The role of repository libraries”, Library Management, Vol. 20 Nos 1/2, pp. 7-9.

3. Hormia-Poutanen, K. and Mikkonen, P. (2010), “FinELib: an important infrastructure for research”, in Collier, M. (Ed.), Business Planning for Digital Libraries, Leuven University Press, Leuven, pp. 166-176.

4. Hyödynmaa, M. , Ahlholm-Kannisto, A. and Nurminen, H. (2010), “How to evaluate library collections: a case study of collection mapping”, Collection Building, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 43-49.

5. International (2011), “Evaluation of the National Library of Finland: report of the evaluation panel”, reports of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland 2011:14, Helsinki, Ministry of Education and Culture, available at: www.minedu.fi/export/sites/default/OPM/Julkaisut/2011/liitteet/okm14.pdf?lang=en.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3