Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine different approaches to framing interviews from the planning stage of interview design, drawing on Goffman’s (1974) notion of frame analysis.
Design/methodology/approach
Reflecting on previous studies the author has been involved with, in the context of accountability, three approaches to framing interviews are presented and discussed.
Findings
Framing interviews around the experience of interviewees, peers or fictitious yet familiar others provides three pathways to access interviewees’ insights, perspectives, knowledge and experience on issues relevant and familiar to them.
Research limitations/implications
The approaches to framing interviews detailed in the paper provide valuable alternatives to access interviewees’ personal insights based on their worlds and worldviews.
Originality/value
Consideration of interviews on accountability through the use of framing and frame analysis provides novel, strategic perspectives on interview design.
Reference44 articles.
1. Beyond neopositivists, romantics, and localists: a reflexive approach to interviews in organizational research;Academy of Management Review,2003
2. Getting reticent young male participants to talk: using artefact-mediated interviews to promote discursive interaction;Qualitative Social Work,2013
3. Belapuna, R. (2021), “Understanding financial management capabilities with community-based organisations in Papua New Guinea”, Master of Philosophy thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
4. Forward,1985
5. Two concepts of accountability: accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism;West European Politics,2010