Author:
Sweeney Jill,Armstrong Robert W.,Johnson Lester W.
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to revisit our original paper published over 20 years ago and reflect on its purpose, contribution and what we can glean that might have implications for future research.
Design/methodology/approach
A Google Scholar search showed that the article was cited 74 times. We discuss some of the contexts in which it was cited and identify two research themes that have emanated from this paper and hold promise for future research.
Findings
We discuss two of the several contexts in which our research is discussed. These include the differential ways in which cues are used in a services context, including the ways in which different cues are used to evaluate services and how cues are used to develop consumer expectations.
Originality/value
The study, which was cited 74 times according to Google Scholar, was formative in terms of discussion of, for example, how a variety of cues influence customer expectations and service evaluation, and how categories of cues, such as marketer controlled versus non-marketer controlled and personal versus non-personal, impact outcomes. The retrospective analysis was helpful in both reflecting on the status quo on some of these issues and suggesting directions for future research.
Reference54 articles.
1. Effectiveness of marketing cues on consumer perceptions of quality: the moderation role of brand reputation and third-party information;Psychology & Marketing,2012
2. Dimensions of consumer expertise,1987
3. Consumers’ level of expectations for services and role of implicit service promises;Services Marketing Quarterly,2006
4. Effects of framing on evaluations of comparable and noncomparable alternatives by expert and novice consumers,1987
5. A dynamic process model of service quality: from expectations to behavioral intentions;Journal of Marketing Research,1993
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献