Have you met your organization's computer usage policy?

Author:

Foltz Charles B.,Paul Cronan Timothy,Jones Thomas W.

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the effectiveness of computer usage policies in university settings.Design/methodology/approachStudents enrolled in business courses at three midwestern universities were divided, by class, into control and experimental groups. All subjects were asked to complete a survey regarding their awareness of university computer usage policies, consequences of misuse, and methods of policy distribution. The experimental group was exposed to sample computer usage policies. Two weeks later, all subjects were asked to complete the same survey again.FindingsResults suggest that most students have not read their university computer usage policies. However, the presence of a computer usage policy does influence students who have read those policies, but a single exposure is insufficient to influence all subjects.Research limitations/implicationsThe sample is limited to students from three universities.Practical implicationsWritten policy statements alone cannot serve as a cornerstone of security; multiple factors must be used to communicate the content of the deterrents.Originality/valueThis study notes that the existence of computer usage policies within a university (or organization) does not ensure that all users are familiar with the content of those policies and the penalties imposed for their violation. Providing a copy of computer usage policies to students (or employees) and verbally highlighting major points are not sufficient exposure to eliminate indifference about computer misuse.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Industrial relations,Management Information Systems

Reference37 articles.

1. Andenaes, J. (1975), “General prevention revisited: research and policy implications”, General Deterrence: A Conference on Current Research and Standpoints, National Swedish Council for Crime Prevention, Stockholm, pp. 12‐59.

2. Anderson, L.S. (1979), “The deterrent effect of criminal sanctions: reviewing the evidence”, in Brentingham, P.J. and Kress, J.M. (Eds), Structure, Law, and Power, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.

3. Anthes, G.H. (1996), “Hack attack: cyberthieves siphon millions from US firms”, Computerworld, Vol. 30 No. 16, p. 81.

4. Backhouse, J. and Dhillon, G. (1995), “Managing computer crime: a research outlook”, Computers & Security, Vol. 14 No. 7, pp. 645‐51.

5. Baskerville, R. (1993), “Information systems security design methods: implications for information systems development”, ACM Computing Surveys, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 375‐414.

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3