Cross‐generational knowledge flows in edge organizations

Author:

Liebowitz Jay,Ayyavoo Nirmala,Nguyen Hang,Carran Deborah,Simien James

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to investigate how cross‐generational biases affect tacit knowledge transfer and resulting knowledge flows in edge organizations.Design/methodology/approachThe paper applied hypothesis testing χ2s, as well as ethnographic analysis.FindingsCross‐generational biases affect tacit knowledge transfer and resulting knowledge flows in edge‐like organizations. Other factors, such as trust, loyalty, work ethics, and family values, also affect knowledge flows.Research limitations/implicationsSample size should be increased for future work, as well as applying the results in a defense/military environment.Practical implicationsThe results of the paper should influence succession planning, human capital strategy, and knowledge management efforts in edge‐like organizations.Originality/valueThe work is quite novel as it integrates inter‐generational differences, tacit knowledge transfer, and knowledge flows in edge organizations.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Strategy and Management,Computer Science Applications,Industrial relations,Management Information Systems

Reference70 articles.

1. Alberts, D.S. and Hayes, R.E. (2003), Power to the Edge: Command and Control in the Information Age, DoD Command and Control Research Program, Washington, DC, available at: www.dodccrp.org.

2. Alberts, D.S. and Hayes, R.E. (2006), Understanding Command and Control, DCCCRP Publication Series, Washington, DC.

3. Alberts, D.S. and Hayes, R.E. (2007), Planning Complex Endeavors, DoD Command and Control Research Program, Washington, DC, available at: www.dodccrp.org.

4. Aldisert, L. (1999), “Generational distinctions: part two”, Bank Marketing, April.

5. ASTD (American Society for Training & Development) (2005), “Departing workers could leave knowledge gaps”, Training & Development Journal, December.

Cited by 55 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3