Antecedents affecting public service motivation

Author:

Camilleri Emanuel

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this article is to examine various antecedents to establish their effect on public service motivation (PSM) and its four dimensions.Design/methodology/approachFive categories of antecedents were examined these included: personal attributes, role states, job characteristics, employee‐leader relations, and employee perception of the organisation. Results were obtained through: structural equation modelling for the examination of multiple relationships between PSM and its dimensions, and the antecedents; and ANOVA for testing the individual hypotheses.FindingsThis study provides some evidence to show that the PSM of public employees is mainly the result of the organisational environment surrounding them. The motivational context variables particularly those related to the organisational setting are the most dominant predictors of the PSM dimensions.Research limitations/implicationsThe empirical results presented in this study should be viewed as preliminary that necessitate further extensive empirical research.Practical implicationsThe findings suggest that public sector management has the task of creating a proper and appropriate climate for its employees. Furthermore, PSM has generated particular interest because it is perceived or assumed to have a positive impact on the job behaviour of individuals in particular, job satisfaction and fulfilment, and their respective level of performance. It is therefore important that public sector organisations find ways of encouraging PSM amongst its employees.Originality/valueThis paper contributes to the literature regarding PSM by examining the relationship between dominant antecedents and the dimensions of PSM, and presents the findings as a model to show the dynamics in these relationships.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference54 articles.

1. Anderson, J.C. and Gerbing, D.W. (1988), “Structural equation modelling in practice: a review and recommended two step approach”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411‐23.

2. Babakus, E., Cravens, D.W., Johnston, M. and Moncrief, W.C. (1996), “Examining the role of organisational variables in the salesperson job satisfaction model”, The Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 33‐42.

3. Bagozzi, R.P. and Phillips, L.W. (1982), “Representing and testing organisational theories: a holistic construal”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 27, pp. 459‐89.

4. Baldwin, J. (1984), “Are we really lazy?”, Review of Public Personnel Administration, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 80‐9.

5. Bandura, A. (1986), Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3