The hidden organisational costs of using non‐standard employment

Author:

Allan Cameron

Abstract

The growth of non‐standard or atypical forms of employment, such as part‐time, casual work and so on, represents one of the most dramatic changes in the structure of employment in Australia and other countries since the late 1970s. Management employment strategies have been identified as a major causal factor in the expansion of non‐standard employment. Employers are increasingly using these atypical forms of employment as a means of lowering direct labour costs. Argues, however, that there are a number of hidden costs involved in using non‐standard employment that are not commonly taken into consideration. Highlights the negative effects atypical employment can have on work relations, and the motivation of employees, based on a detailed hospital case study and other evidence. Argues that atypical labour may serve to undermine quality standards and the attainment of business strategies.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Applied Psychology

Reference36 articles.

1. Aparicio, I., Valerde, M., Kabst, R., Brewster, C. and Mayne, L. (1997), “Conclusion: the flexibility paradox”, Employee Relations, Vol. 19 No. 6, pp. 596‐608.

2. Atkinson, J. (1984), “Manpower strategies for flexible organisations”, Personnel Management, August, pp. 28‐31.

3. Atkinson, J. (1987), “Flexibility or fragmentation? The United Kingdom labour market in the 1980s”, Labour and Society, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 87‐105.

4. Blyton, P. (1996), “Workforce flexibility”, in Towers, B. (Ed.), The Handbook of Human Resource Management, 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford.

5. Bramble, T. and Littler, C. (1996), “Labour‐use strategies in the context of recession: provisional evidence from 1993‐1996”, in Fells, R. and Todd, T. (Eds), Current Research in Industrial Relations, Proceedings of the 10th AIRAANZ Conference, February, the Association of Industrial Relations Academics of Australia and New Zealand.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3