Author:
Blombäck Anna,Wigren-Kristoferson Caroline
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this article is to improve our understanding of the nature of social responsibility in actual practices and, specifically, the influence of individuals on these processes.
Design/methodology/approach
– An abductive approach is applied (Alvesson and Sköldberg 1994), i.e. theory is developed by moving between theory and four empirical cases. The stories highlight the importance of the individual and closeness to local stakeholders and the presence of overlapping rationales.
Findings
– The individuals’ simultaneous roles – as owners, managers and community members – influence how they are held or see themselves as accountable and how they account for the firms’ engagement in the community. The activities are conducted in the name of the firm but originate from private as well as business-oriented concerns. Our conclusions encourage an extension of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) construct to approach it as an entangled phenomenon resulting from the firm and the individual embeddedness in internal and external cultures.
Originality/value
– This study brings the individual managers and owner-managers into focus and how their interplay with the surrounding context can create additional dimensions of accountability, which impact on the decisions taken in regard to CSR. A micro-perspective is applied. Corporate community responsibility, particularly in smaller and rural communities, contributes to recognize and understand how individuals influence and are influenced by CSR.
Subject
Social Sciences (miscellaneous),General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference62 articles.
1. Aguilera, R.V.
,
Rupp, D.E.
,
Williams, C.A.
and
Ganapathi, J.
(2007), “Putting the S back in CSR: a multilevel theory of social change in organizations”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32 No. 3, pp. 836-863.
2. Altman, B.W.
(1999), “Transformed corporate community relations: a management tool for achieving corporate citizenship”, Business and Society Review, Vol. 102 No. 1, pp. 43-51.
3. Alvesson, M.
and
Sköldberg, K.
(1994), Tolkning Och Reflektion: Vetenskapsfilosofi Och kvalitativ Metod, Studentlitteratur, Lund.
4. Andriof, J.
and
McIntosh, M.
(2001), “Introduction”, in
Jörg Andriof,
,
J.
,
Malcom McIntosh,
and
M.
(Eds), Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship, Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp. 13-24.
5. Ashman, I.
and
Winstanley, D.
(2007), “For or against corporate identity? Personification and the problem of moral agency”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 76 No. 1, pp. 83-95.
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献