Developing sustainable reporting standards

Author:

Aras Güler,Crowther David

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to evaluate the development of reporting standards for both financial reporting and for corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting. It aims to argue that both International Financial Reporting Standards and US Generally Accepted Accounting Principles are vehicles of colonial exploitation and cannot be sustainable. This can be contrasted with the voluntary approach to the development of CSR reporting standards.Design/methodology/approachThe methodological approach is dialectical, and is based upon diagnosis and concomitant prognosis.FindingsThe findings take the form of an evaluation of progress so far in the harmonisation of financial reporting standards, the development of CSR reporting standards and the consequences are contrasted with the rhetorical justification. From this a prognosis is developed.Research limitations/implicationsThe implications are a projection into the future and therefore subject to limitations.Originality/valueThis paper increases the understanding of the relationship between standards development and exploitation and the implications for the longer term.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Accounting

Reference38 articles.

1. Alfredson, K. (2003), “Pathway to 2005 IASB standards”, Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13 No. 1, pp. 3‐8.

2. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2007a), “Sustainable corporate social responsibility and the value chain”, in Crowther, D. and Zain, M.M. (Eds), New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility, MARA University Press, pp. 119‐40.

3. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2007b), “Is the global economy sustainable”, in Barber, S. (Ed.), The Geopolitics of the City, Forum Press, London, pp. 165‐94.

4. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2007c), “The development of corporate social responsibility”, Effective Executive, Vol. X No. 9, pp. 18‐21.

5. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2008a), “The social obligation of corporations”, Journal of Knowledge Globalization, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 43‐59.

Cited by 27 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Anthropological Implications Between the Environment and Sustainability;Advances in Environmental Engineering and Green Technologies;2024-06-28

2. The Role of Accounting and Audit in Sustainable Development;Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence;2024-06-01

3. The evolution of sustainability accounting and reporting in the United States: applications of the ecological anthropology and industrial ecology frameworks;Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development;2024-04-25

4. Cross-country comparative trend analysis in ESG regulatory framework across developed and developing nations;Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal;2023-08-29

5. Accountant Perceptions and Attitudes Towards the Social Accounting Practices in Bangladesh;International Journal of Corporate Finance and Accounting;2023-03-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3