Flexibility or ethical dilemma: an overview of the work from home policies in modern organizations around the world

Author:

Timsal Ahmad,Awais Mustabsar

Abstract

Purpose The primary purpose of this paper is to highlight the pros and cons associated with the work from home policies and how these policies differ across countries and cultures. The main question to be answered is that why a perk or benefit is now being considered as an ethical issue. Design/methodology/approach Opinions of practitioners and examples of some leading controversial work from home policies have been discussed in detail. Examples from the developed countries have been compared with those of less developed countries, to present a cross country analysis. Findings Culture has a significant impact on the flexible work arrangement policies. Although many companies endorse some degree of flexibility for working mothers or parents in general, working from home as a universal policy is still debatable. The decision to offer this facility to employees majorly depends upon the geographic location of that organization. Originality/value All the discussions and views expressed solely belong to the authors. This paper can be extended by adding some empirical evidences from the companies who actually offer this facility to their employees.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Reference8 articles.

1. Baytcom (2015), “Bayt: the advantages and disadvantages of working from home”, available at: www.bayt.com/en/career-article-1601/ (accessed 3 March 2016).

2. Bloom, N. (2014), Harvard Business Review: To Raise Productivity, Let More Employees Work from Home, available at: https://hbr.org/2014/01/to-raise-productivity-let-more-employees-work-from-home (accessed 3 March 2016).

3. Gretchen, M. (2011), “Travel agent central – home-based businesses on the rise”, available at: www.travelagentcentral.com/home-based/trends-research/home-based-businesses-rise-27450 (accessed 6 March 2016).

4. Hofstede, G. (2016), “The Hofstede center: country comparison-Pakistan”, available at: http://geert-hofstede.com/pakistan.html (accessed 20 March 2016).

5. International data center (2015), “IDC forecasts US mobile worker population to surpass 105 Million by 2020”, available at: www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS25705415 (accessed 5 March 2016).

Cited by 18 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3