CMHTs for older people: team managers’ views surveyed
Author:
Abendstern Michele,Brand Christian,Harrington Val,Jasper Rowan,Tucker Sue,Wilberforce Mark,Challis David
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to identify features of community mental health teams (CMHTs) for older people valued by their managers, and those they would most like to change.
Design/methodology/approach
– Content analysis was used to analyse “free text” responses to open questions from a national survey about CMHTs’ organisational structures and processes. Responses were sorted into statements which were categorised into content areas and higher level dimensions.
Findings
– Free text information was provided by 376 teams (an 88 per cent response rate). Eight higher level dimensions were identified. One related specifically to integration with social care services, whilst several more included material about other aspects of intra-team integration (e.g. documentation and location). The largest proportion of statements related to staffing and teamwork. Statements about inter-personal and inter-professional issues were largely positive, whilst statements about resources, bureaucracy and integration with social care services typically detailed desired changes.
Practical implications
– Four key issues emerged comprising a high level of support from managers to develop integrated practices; a need to define the focus of CMHTs for older people and to be fully resourced; and the importance of a nurturing and supportive team environment.
Originality/value
– The methodology provides a bridge between qualitative and quantitative research, exploring the volume of statements on particular topics and their meaning.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science,Health (social science)
Reference29 articles.
1. Abendstern, M.
,
Harrington, V.
,
Brand, C.
,
Tucker, S.
,
Wilberforce, M.
and
Challis, D.
(2012), “Variations in structures, processes and outcomes of community mental health teams for older people: a systematic review of the literature”,
Aging and Mental Health
, Vol. 16 No. 7, pp. 861-873. 2. Begay, W.
,
Lee, D.R.
,
Martin, J.
and
Ray, M.
(2004), “Quantifying qualitative data”,
Journal of Library Administration
, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 111-119. 3. Borrill, C.
,
West, M.
,
Shapiro, D.
and
Rees, A.
(2000), “Team working and effectiveness in health care”,
British Journal of Health Care Management
, Vol. 6 No. 8, pp. 364-371. 4. Cameron, A.
,
Lart, R.
,
Bostock, L.
and
Coomber, C.
(2014), “Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services: a review of research literature”,
Health and Social Care in the Community
, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 225-233. 5. Cashman, S.
,
Reidy, P.
,
Cody, K.
and
Lemay, C.
(2004), “Developing and measuring progress towards collaborative integrated, interdisciplinary health care teams”,
Journal of Interprofessional Care
, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 284-196.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|