Library graphic design best practices and approval processes

Author:

Wakimoto Diana K

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore graphic design best practices and approval processes used by librarians. Design/methodology/approach – This paper used an online, qualitative survey to collect data on librarians’ design processes and best practices. The responses were reviewed to determine categories and themes of librarians’ design processes and best practices to gain an understanding of the state of graphic design in libraries. Findings – The majority of the respondents reported that there were no formal guidelines, design committees or approval processes at their libraries. While some librarians were aware of and used graphic design best practices, many respondents were unsure of what constituted a best practice in graphic design. Research limitations/implications – The paper was exploratory and the respondents cannot be said to be representative of all librarians and, therefore, generalizations to all librarians are not possible. Practical implications – Findings may help librarians who assume design duties in their libraries in exploring best practices and discussing design approval processes. Originality/value – This paper is one of the few papers in the library science literature on graphic design as applied specifically to librarians. It increases our understanding of graphic design in libraries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Library and Information Sciences

Reference29 articles.

1. Alway-Rosenstock, S. (2011), “ReDesign: the design education of a non-designer”, Design Principles and Practices: An International Journal , Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 173-179.

2. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2015), “Why group brainstorming is a waste of time”, Harvard Business Review , available at: https://hbr.org/2015/03/why-group-brainstorming-is-a-waste-of-time (accessed 25 June 2015).

3. Chow, A.S. , Bridges, M. and Commander, P. (2014), “The website design and usability of US academic and public libraries: findings from a nationwide study”, Reference & User Services Quarterly , Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 253-265.

4. Cresswell, J.W. (2008), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Los Angeles, CA.

5. Dabner, D. , Calvert, S. and Casey, A. (2010), Graphic Design School: The Principles and Practice of Graphic Design , 4th ed., Wiley, Hoboken, NJ.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3