Perception of 3D-printing: analysis of manufacturing use and adoption

Author:

Schniederjans Dara G.,Yalcin Mehmet G.

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify ways in which five technology adoption theories converge to enhance insight on 3D-printing perceptions and adoption. Design/methodology/approach A total of 63 structured interviews were conducted with top management professionals from a variety of manufacturing organizations throughout the USA. After controlling for top management decision power, total of 35 interviews and non-parametric statistical analyses were used in conjunction with innovation adoption theory to derive four propositions. Findings Results show five adoption theories converge to create a new adoption model specific to 3D-printing. Results also suggests differences specific to users, potential users and non-users. Originality/value Results delineate between current, potential and non-users to better understand adoption. Dissimilar to current qualitative research, quantitative (non-parametric) techniques are used to examine the viability of the propositions. Further, the results use various adoption theories to determine convergences specific to 3D-printing.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Mechanical Engineering

Reference67 articles.

1. A methodological framework for the inclusion of modern additive manufacturing into the production portfolio of a focused factory;Journal of Manufacturing Systems,2014

2. From intention to actions: a theory of planned behavior,1985

3. The theory of planned behavior;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1991

4. Alec, A. (2016), “Daimler to 3D-print plastic spare parts for Mercedes trucks”, available at: www.3ders.org/articles/20160713-daimler-to-3d-print-plastic-spare-parts-for-mercedes-trucks-starting-in-september.html (accessed 3 August 2016).

5. Allen, N. (2013), “Why 3D-printing is overhyped”, available at: http://gizmodo.com/why-3d-printing-is-overhyped-i-should-know-i-do-it-fo-508176750 (accessed 3 August 2016).

Cited by 19 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3