Author:
Chakraborty Subrata,Philip Tiny
Abstract
Unprecedented changes sweeping the world during the last few years have given rise to the need for the development and adoption of contingency strategies. This requires firms to have strategic flexibility in every aspect of their operation. Vendor development strategies constitute an important component in achieving this flexibility. Attempts to draw up an explicit conceptual link between generic business unit strategies and generic vendor development strategies. Proposes a vendor structure framework with three dimensions representing vendor structure scope, vendor structure relationship and vendor structure focus. Uses the framework to develop certain generic vendor development strategies. Considers the four generic strategies suggested by Porter, namely industry‐wide cost leadership strategy, industry‐wide differentiation strategy, segment cost leadership strategy and segment differentiation strategy and, for each one of these, proposes appropriate vendor development strategies.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference29 articles.
1. 1.Drucker, P., Age of Discontinuity, Harper & Row, New York, NY, 1969.
2. 2.Toffler, A., Future Shock, Bantam Books, New York, NY, 1970.
3. 3.Jauck, L.R. and Glueck, W.F., Business Policy and Strategic Management, McGraw‐Hill, London, 1976.
4. 4.Carlsson, B., “Flexibility and the theory of the firm”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 7 No. 2, 1989, pp. 179‐204.
5. 5.De Meyer, A., Nakane, J., Miller, J.G. and Ferdows, K., “Flexibility: the next competitive battle, the manufacturing futures survey”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 10 No. 2, 1989, pp. 135‐44.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献