How creative vouchers can allocate public resources for innovation effectively

Author:

Coletti MicheleORCID,Landoni PaoloORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose is to assess the usefulness of creative vouchers, a specific kind of technology and innovation vouchers (small grants usually given to SMEs to acquire external knowledge) where the knowledge suppliers are creative firms such as design agencies.Design/methodology/approachA multiple case analysis of four EU-funded pilot voucher schemes was carried out through project reports and semi-structured interviews with relevant stakeholders.FindingsThe authors show that creative vouchers are effective policy instruments despite the limited amount of money involved because they trigger new innovation trajectories often in a serendipitous way. The authors also show that the quality of projects and satisfaction of the beneficiaries increase when both proposals and suppliers are screened.Research limitations/implicationsThe authors’ conclusions are based on four pilot projects in a specific region of the world (Western Europe). Though two of them were extended to a much bigger scale, their generalizability may be limited. Moreover, the limited number of cases does not permit an analytical evaluation of all the voucher schemes mechanisms.Practical implicationsThe findings of this paper can be very useful to policymakers designing voucher schemes and to the companies involved, whether they are providers or beneficiaries. In particular, the voucher allocation mechanisms may have a strong impact on the success of the program.Social implicationsThe innovation spurred by the collaboration with creative firms is generally neither energy-intensive nor capital intensive, but brain intensive, and this is the best way to leverage on the talent of local creative and make companies create value based on immaterial resources.Originality/valueTo the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study of creative vouchers after Bakhsiet al., 2015, and the only one involving several schemes in different countries. It shows the innovation potential of such a little known policy instrument for SMEs. Moreover, it provides insight on how to design a voucher scheme in order to improve its effectiveness.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation

Reference75 articles.

1. Do government R&D subsidies stimulate collaboration initiatives in private firms?;Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2020

2. How do firms perceive policy rationales behind the variety of instruments supporting collaborative R&D? Lessons from the European Framework Programs;Technovation,2014

3. Bakhshi, H., Edwards, J., Roper, S., Scully, J. and Shaw, D. (2011), “Creating innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: evaluating the short-term effects of the creative credits pilot”, Nesta Working Paper, available at: http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/creatinginnovation-small-and-medium-sized-enterprises

4. Assessing an experimental approach to industrial policy evaluation: applying RCT+ to the case of Creative Credits;Research Policy,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3