Author:
Kumar Vijay,Sundarraj Rangaraja P
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to determine how different innovation patterns affect the financial performance of global technological firms.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors integrate the theories of innovation performance with those of Schumpeter’s innovation patterns, namely, creative destruction and creative accumulation. Data spread over 20 years is used to investigate the influence of innovation on the firm performance.
Findings
– Panel regression results indicate that, as compared to creative-destruction innovation, creative-accumulation patterns have a better firm performance, have a moderating effect on innovation-performance relationships, and have a better propensity to deal with difficult economic periods.
Research limitations/implications
– There is a scarcity of research that considers the effects of Schumpeterian patterns on innovation performance, especially ones dealing with the technology sector. Future work could consider other innovation variables (besides innovation patterns), as well as whether the results hold in other sectors.
Practical implications
– The findings indicate that in the tech-sector firms must continue to innovate.
Originality/value
– From the research perspective, the work integrates two streams of literature into a comprehensive model, and provides a holistic test for it. For tech-sector managers, the research provides one point of motivation for carrying out innovation even during a troubled economy.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation
Reference74 articles.
1. Acs, Z.J.
and
Audretsch, D.B.
(1987), “Innovation, market structure and firm size”,
The Review of Economics and Statistics
, Vol. 69 No. 4, pp. 567-575.
2. Ahuja, G.
,
Lampert, C.
and
Tandon, V.
(2008), “Moving beyond Schumpeter: management research on the determinants of technological innovation”,
The Academy of Management Annals
, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 1-98.
3. Anandarajan, A.
,
Chin, C.
,
Chi, H.
,
Lee, P.
(2007), “The effect of innovative activity on firm performance: the experience of Taiwan”,
Advances in Accounting
, Vol. 23, pp. 1-30.
4. Andras, T.
and
Srinivasan, S.
(2003), “Advertising intensity and R
&
D intensity: differences across industries and their impact on firm’s performance”,
International Journal of Business and Economics
, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 167-176.
5. Archibugi, D.
,
Evangelista, R.
and
Simonetti, R.
(1995), “Concentration, firm size and innovation: evidence from innovation costs”,
Technovation
, Vol. 15 No. 3, pp. 153-163.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献