Abstract
PurposeWhile it is argued that entrepreneurship provides considerable freedom, it is also underlined that it might have the potential for exclusion and oppression. The study contributes to this debate and aims to investigate how entrepreneurs with disabilities (EWD) ascribe meaning to freedom in a contested terrain informed by entrepreneurial autonomy as well as constraints due to impairments and an ableist social environment.Design/methodology/approachThe study uses a qualitative approach and builds upon the critical concepts of negative, positive and social freedom as a theoretical lens for the in-depth analysis of the twenty-nine semi-structured interviews with EWD in Hungary.FindingsFindings indicate that EWD experiences freedom in ambivalent ways. Engaging in the discourse of entrepreneurship offers a subversive discursive toolkit to debunk the constraints established by ableism, enabling both negative and positive freedom. However, individualism being at the heart of entrepreneurship results in othering and undermines social freedom. Thus, while entrepreneurship offers greater individual freedom in both a negative and a positive sense for people with disabilities (PWD), it nevertheless fails to promote collective social change.Originality/valueContributing to the critical disability literature, findings contrast the view that having an impairment only reduces a person's abilities and highlight that it also affects the very nature of liberty. Contributing to critical studies on entrepreneurship, the case of EWD provides empirical evidence for understanding the simultaneous emancipatory and oppressive character of entrepreneurship through the interplay of the subjective experience of freedom related to disability and entrepreneurship.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference70 articles.
1. The process and experiences of self-employment among people with disabilities: a qualitative study;Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin,2018
2. Managerial skills required by entrepreneurs with physical and mobility disabilities;International Journal of Management Sciences,2015
3. Berlin, I. (1969), “Two concepts of liberty”, in Warburton, N. (Ed.), Basic Readings, Routledge, London, pp. 159-170.
4. Freedom and disability rights: dependence, independence, and interdependence;Metaphilosophy,2016
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献