Assessing stakeholders' influence on social performance of infrastructure projects

Author:

Doloi Hemanta

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of the research presented in this paper is to develop a framework for an accurate understanding and assessment of the social performance and value creation of public infrastructure projects. Social performance evaluation is an important component of sustainable project development. In this research, the measure of social sustainability performance of projects within sustainable the development context is quantified in terms of social benefits flowing to the stakeholders as well as to the community at large.Design/methodology/approachIn this research, a framework is developed to evaluate social performance based on stakeholders' networks and their influences in the project. Adopting the social network analysis (SNA) methodology, stakeholders are firstly identified according to their roles in the project and relationships are investigated based on a structured interview process. A case study was used to demonstrate the applicability of the framework. Integrating the impact of stakeholders and their satisfaction level, a social performance indicator (SPI) is synthesised as a measure of quantifying social sustainability in projects.FindingsThe key contribution of this research includes identifying the subsystems functioning in social sustainability, developing criteria for social value evaluation with regard to subsystems in social sustainability performance, identifying the influence of individual stakeholders in social networks, generating a social performance index by synthesising the needs of different stakeholders in the social network, and balancing the three subsystems in the project. A framework for evaluating social performance is developed and further demonstrated by a case study in Australia.Research limitations/implicationsThe framework should be further tested using complex projects with diverse stakeholders, which potentially may expand the social dimensions as a complex system within the project development environment. While the accuracy of data is the key for achieving objective outcomes in the social network analysis, integration with other traditional stakeholder management approach may simplify the data collection process. Introduction of project information in advance should improve participation rate and accuracy in response among the key stakeholders.Practical implicationsThe framework facilitates the construction industry professionals for an accurate estimation of social performance and value creation of public infrastructure projects. This capability should assist all parties, such as clients, policy makers, strategists, financiers, community leaders, etc., involved in making informed decisions in infrastructure planning and development.Originality/valueSustainability development still needs to be translated inro many disciplines and discourses, including construction and project management within the built environment. Social network analysis is an increasingly popular tool that represents an opportunity for developing interesting and useful approaches associated with stakeholder integration. The attempt to combine the degree of centrality of stakeholders and perceived social value presented in this research is quite intriguing in the context of measuring social sustainability performance of projects.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference46 articles.

1. Allenby, B. and Richards, D.J. (1999), “Applying the triple buttom line: telework and the environment”, Environmental Quality Management, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 3‐10.

2. Babu, P.R. (2009), “Stakeholders, spatial locations and time horizons in an extended social cost‐benefit analysis: a case of Pipalpankha Water Resource Project”, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 245‐65.

3. Becker, E., Jahn, T. and Stiess, I. (1999), Sustainability and the Social Sciences: A Cross‐Disciplinary Approach to Integrating Environmental Considerations into Theoretical Reorientation, Zed Books, London.

4. Biart, M. (2002), “Social sustainability as part of the social agenda of the European Community”, in Ritt, T. (Ed.), Soziale Nachhaltigkeit: Von der Umweltpolitik zur Nachhaltigkeit? Informationen zur Umweltpolitik 149, Arbeiterkammer Wien, Wien, pp. 5‐10.

5. Boyer, T. and Polasky, S. (2004), “Valuing urban wetlands: a review of non‐market valuation studies”, Wetlands, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 744‐55.

Cited by 65 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3