Government measures needed to promote building energy efficiency (BEE) in China

Author:

Qian Queena K.,Chan Edwin H.W.

Abstract

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to investigate the major differences between the government's role in building energy efficiency (BEE) in China and three developed countries, and to further the understanding of market expectations of the most effective government measures to encourage BEE development in China.Design/methodology/approachThe approach taken was: establish a framework for a critical comparative study; compare and assess the BEE promotion measures available to governments in the USA, Canada, the UK and China; survey the BEE market expectations of building design professionals to better understand the favourable measures the Chinese Government could take to further promote BEE; and triangulate the findings of the comparative study and questionnaire survey to develop recommendations for BEE promotion in mainland China.FindingsEconomic incentives are important for BEE promotion at the current stage, but they are lacking in China. Active government interventions, such as adjusting energy pricing and implementing BEE legislation, are needed in China if BEE is to become economically viable and efficient.Research limitations/implicationsOwing to limited resources, the questionnaire survey did not reach every part of China. A further study should be carried out to extend the investigation to more areas of China and to obtain wider stakeholder coverage.Originality/valueThe originality of this paper lies in its development of a theoretical framework to further understanding of the government's role in BEE promotion and its use of first‐hand data collected from industry to verify market expectations of that role in China.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference77 articles.

1. Akerlof, G. (1970), “The market for ’lemons’: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 84, pp. 488‐500.

2. Andersen, M.S. and Sprenger, R.U. (Eds) (2000), Market‐based Instruments for Environmental Management – Politics and Institutions, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.

3. Anthony, F. and Rothkopf, M. (1989), “Market failure and energy policy”, Energy Policy, Vol. 17 No. 4, p. 397.

4. Atsusaka, N. (2003), “Growing the green building industry in lane county – a report for the lane county sustainable business and job project”, report prepared from the Program for Watershed and Community Health, Institute for a Sustainable Environment, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR.

5. Bowers, K. and Cohen, L. (2009), The Green Building Revolution: Addressing and Managing Legal Risks and Liabilities, Environmental Law & Policy Clinic, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, MA, pp. 1‐35, March 10.

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3