Author:
Cigolini Roberto,Miragliotta Giovanni,Pero Margherita
Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to focus on the outsourcing facilities management (FM) services in small to medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs).Design/methodology/approachThe paper employs a Define‐Measure‐Analyze‐Improve‐Control (DMAIC) methodology. A survey in Italy, a country quite representative when talking about SMEs, is first presented and evidence from the field is discussed. Stemming from the evidence, a road‐map is presented to overcome these criticalities and to support, also in SMEs, the diffusion of the outsourcing of the FM services, whose benefits in terms of higher efficiency and better service are already being experienced by larger companies. The proposed model is then validated through the extensive survey on small and medium‐sized Italian enterprises.FindingsThe survey shows that the current level of adoption of advanced outsourcing practices is very low: less than 5 percent of the companies in the sample resort to a single supplier delivering multiple FM services. The adoption rate of such practices is hence very low, and the survey has pointed out three different levels of causes: size‐related, cultural, and managerial.Research limitations/implicationsThe survey used in this paper is based on a questionnaire but does not consider non‐respondents. The database of companies provided by IFMA – Italian Chapter – could also possibly introduce bias.Practical implicationsStarting with the early recognition that the main problem in the field implementations of result‐oriented approaches lies in determining whether the expected results have been achieved and that two key tools are available (i.e. the service level agreement and the reporting system), the model suggests a new organizational and managerial structure, even simpler than the traditional (i.e. not integrated) approach. To design the kernel of the control system, DMAIC has been used, after a specific customization.Social implicationsResults show a widespread outsourcing of the facilities‐related services in the larger organizations and some hurdles of the smaller ones in exploiting all the opportunities offered, so that – on average – the management of facilities‐related services represents an opportunity to exploit rather than an actually implemented methodology.Originality/valueOnly a few international contributions refer to local environments: here an extensive survey involving more than 1,000 Italian companies is presented.
Subject
Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference36 articles.
1. Atkin, B. and Brooks, A. (2000), Total Facilities Management, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
2. Barnes, D., Hinton, M. and Mieczkowska, S. (2004), “The strategic management of operations in e‐business”, Production Planning and Control, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 484‐94.
3. Barret, P. (1995), Facilities Management: Towards Better Practice, Blackwell Science, Oxford.
4. Barret, P. (2000), “Achieving strategic facilities management through strong relationships”, Facilities, Vol. 18 Nos 10‐12, pp. 421‐6.
5. Best, R., Langston, C. and de Valence, G. (2003), “Continuous improvement”, in Best, R., Langston, C. and de Valence, G. (Eds), Workplace Strategies and Facilities Management: Building in Value, Butterworth‐Heinemann, Oxford, pp. 1‐8.
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献