Author:
Hui P.S.,Wong L.T.,Mui K.W.
Abstract
PurposeThis study seeks to investigate the usefulness of occupant acceptance as a preliminary screen measure for offices' indoor air quality (IAQ). An effective alert indication of IAQ problems of a concerned indoor environment would help to promote good IAQ.Design/methodology/approachThe study evaluates the hypothesis that the occupant dissatisfaction with the overall indoor environment provides an indication of IAQ problems. Hence, occupant dissatisfaction would be used as a screening parameter to identify problematic IAQ regarding some IAQ criteria in subsequent IAQ assessments. The hypothesis was tested with a database of regional cross‐sectional measurement in 490 offices within Hong Kong.FindingsThe occupants' dissatisfaction with the indoor environmental quality (IEQ) was correlated with the IAQ assessment results of nine IAQ assessment parameters regarding some IAQ criteria for air‐conditioned offices. At certain screening levels of predicted IEQ dissatisfaction, the performance of the proposed screening tool, indicating unsatisfactory office IAQ, was evaluated in terms of the test sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and Yule's Q statistics. The results showed that occupants' response to the indoor environment produced indications of unsatisfactory IAQ regarding the requirement of an “Excellent” office.Research limitations/implicationsThe subjective feelings of occupants are capable of identifying marked indoor environmental problems, but cannot identify the “marginal” IAQ problem cases.Practical implicationsThe study shows the usefulness of using occupant acceptance to identify the unrecognized IAQ problems for air‐conditioned office environment. Using the identification model developed in the study, all the suspected cases were associated with a high chance of IAQ dissatisfaction and subsequent IAQ assessments were thus recommended.Originality/valueThe paper proposes a new identification method to identify the unrecognized IAQ problems which may indicate unsatisfactory IAQ. Also, the occupants' responses on the indoor environment are quantified.
Subject
Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics
Reference27 articles.
1. Butala, V. and Muhic, S. (2007), “Perception of air quality and the thermal environment in offices”, Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 302‐10.
2. Chao, C.Y., Chan, G.Y. and Ho, L. (2001), “Feasibility study of an indoor air quality measurement protocol on 12 parameters in mechanically ventilated and air‐conditioned buildings”, Indoor and Built Environment, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 3‐19.
3. ENV Ministry of the Environment (1996), Singapore Guidelines for Good Indoor Air Quality in Office Premises, ENV Ministry of the Environment.
4. Environment Australia (2001), State of Knowledge Report: Air Toxics and Indoor Air Quality in Australia: Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government, Canberra.
5. Fanger, P.O. (1972), Thermal Comfort, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献