Purpose, process, place: design as a research tool

Author:

Duffy Francis,Craig David,Gillen Nicola

Abstract

PurposeThe objective of this paper is to investigate how design variables – specifically spatial arrangements and adjacencies (which are termed “place”) – can be best deployed to improve working practices (which are called “process”) in order to help creative organisations to enhance the performance of working groups (i.e. support managerial purpose).Design/methodology/approachObservations of space use over time and questionnaires eliciting participants' opinions on the impact of the new spatial arrangements on working methods were used in two healthcare companies to study the outcomes of pilot projects.FindingsThe managerial objectives in both companies were to create working environments that could be used to stimulate interaction within and between diverse disciplines brought together to develop new healthcare products. Significant benefits were reported, particularly improved accessibility and collaboration within and between working groups – an important conclusion is that no individual design feature was responsible for the changes but rather the weaving together of place and process in pursuit of managerial purpose.Research limitations/implicationsThe interaction of purpose, place and process has led one to conclude that methods dependent on limiting variables and controlling contexts are not appropriate for studying relationships between environment, productivity and user satisfaction. The synoptic, multivariate and interventionist Harvard Business School case study method may be more appropriate.Originality/valueEnvironmental variables are far from being irrelevant to achieving improvements in organisational performance in creative organisations. However, context, purpose and process must also be taken into account.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference13 articles.

1. Becker, F. (1981), Creating Environments in Organizations, Praeger, New York, NY.

2. Clements‐Croome, D. (2000), Creating the Productive Workplace, E. & F.N. Spon, Abingdon.

3. DEGW/Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (2004), “Office design and business performance: technical report”, DEGW, London.

4. Duffy, F. (1974), “Office interiors and organizations”, PhD dissertation, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.

5. Haynes, B.P. (2008), “An evaluation of the impact of the office environment on productivity”, Facilities, Vol. 26 Nos 5/6, pp. 178‐95.

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3