A conceptual framework for hybrid building projects

Author:

Adeyeye Kemi,Bouchlaghem Dino,Pasquire Christine

Abstract

PurposeThis paper aims to focus on hybrid projects as a type of building adaptation work. It seeks to discuss the hybrid building design process in subsets of information and resulting decisions by highlighting the relationship between them. It also aims to present a conceptual framework which was developed by refining, or customising the RIBA Plan of Work.Design/methodology/approachField theory formed the theoretical basis for the approach to mapping the hybrid project process. The conceptual framework itself evolved from a comprehensive literature review, case studies and a practice survey. In total, 11 design and construction professionals evaluated the framework and their comments and feedback are also discussed.FindingsThe discussion presents an approach which can be used to manage the delivery of hybrid projects, although it was found that the proposed framework can be applied to a wider spectrum of construction projects.Research limitations/implicationsThe evaluation of the framework was limited by the number of participants involved and the limited client representation.Originality/valueThe paper makes an original contribution by further exploring an increasingly relevant area of construction activity; building adaptations. Although the research focused specifically on the design‐specific stages of hybrid project delivery, findings contribute towards process improvement by emphasising the need for early information acquisition, early and precise definition of design intent, and collaborative design decision making. These three factors contribute highly to client/user satisfaction (value) and effective project delivery.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Building and Construction,Architecture,Human Factors and Ergonomics

Reference41 articles.

1. Addy, N. (2004), “Planning the path to best value”, Workshop Report E4135, Construction Productivity Network, CIRIA, London.

2. Anfara, V.A. and Mertz, N.T. (2006), Theoretical Frameworks in Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, London.

3. Anumba, C., Egbu, C. and Kashyap, M. (2006), Avoiding Structural Collapses in Refurbishment: A Decision Support System, Research Report 463, Loughborough University for the Health and Safety Executive, Loughborough.

4. Bertelsen, S. and Emmitt, S. (2005), “The client as a complex system”, Proceedings of the 13th International Group for Lean Construction Conference, Sydney, Australia, July 2005.

5. Bouchlaghem, D., Kimmance, A.G. and Anumba, C.J. (2004), “Integrating product and process information in the construction sector”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 104 No. 3, pp. 218‐33.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3