Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate, in an Egyptian context, the external auditor type (Big 4 vs local) implications on reporting quality proxied by discretionary accruals (DA) and also examine whether auditor type impacts the market’s pricing of DA, where pricing is considered a proxy for the perceived DA quality.
Design/methodology/approach
The sample period is 2012–2015, that is meant to be post the Egyptian revolution financial crisis; all Egyptian stock exchange (EGX) listed firms (except banks and financial institutions) are considered. DA are estimated using modified Dichev and Dechow’s (2002) model (McNicholas, 2002). Ordinary least squares regression tests are used to investigate the external auditor type implications on DA level and the related EGX investors’ pricing.
Findings
The findings generally show the external auditor’s minimal role in mitigating DA. Moreover, the findings reflect the EGX investors’ negligence and/or lack of confidence in regards to DA and external auditor type factors in stock pricing.
Practical implications
The paper findings highlight to regulators the need for effective monitoring of audit firms earnings management mitigation performance to help reinforce investor confidence in financial reporting quality.
Originality/value
This paper is the first that investigates the external auditor monitoring mechanism implications on investors’ perceptions of earnings quality in Egypt. The paper findings would provide important contributions, particularly post the Egyptian revolution crisis, where the EGX market is trying to restore the investors’ confidence.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Development,Accounting
Reference73 articles.
1. The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations;Journal of Accounting and Economics,2002
2. The world price of earnings opacity;The Accounting Review,2003
3. An analysis of cross-sectional differences in big and non-big public accounting firms’ audit programs, auditing;A Journal of Practice & Theory,2006
4. Is audit quality different for Big 4 and mid-tier auditors?;Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,2010
5. Boone, J.P., Khurana, I.K. and Raman, K.K. (2009), “Is audit quality different for Big 4 and mid-tier auditors?”, working paper, School of Business, The University of Texas, San Antonio, TX.
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献