The legitimacy of offender management programmes in a post-TR landscape

Author:

Rowe Michael,Irving Adele,Soppitt Sarah

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the under-considered perspectives of service users engaged in various community sentences based on a “strengths-based” approach to desistance. Further to recent changes in the sector, the paper considers service user views for programmes delivered by combinations of agencies from private, public and third sectors. Design/methodology/approach The paper is based on analysis of 64 semi-structured interviews with users of four programmes, accompanied with informal fieldwork observations by the researchers as they carried out the research at the premises of service providers. Findings The research finds that service user perceptions of the legitimacy of programmes are closely related to their understanding of three key dimensions: first, the “authenticity” of those delivering the service; second, the instrumental (in broad terms) gains they expect from engagement; and third, their understanding of the identity and ethos of the programme. Originality/value The paper adds important understanding based on service user perceptions in a period when service provision is being diversified. Further directions for other research are identified and it is recognised that a limitation of the current study is that it incorporates a sample drawn from one area.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Community and Home Care,Law,Safety Research

Reference48 articles.

1. Transforming Rehabilitation: another example of English ‘exceptionalism’ or a blueprint for the rest of Europe?;European Journal of Probation,2014

2. Bottoms, A. (2001), “Compliance and community penalties”, in Bottoms, A., Gelsthorpe, L. and Rex, S. (Eds), Community Penalties: Changes and Challenges, Willan, Cullompton, pp. 87-116.

3. Intended and unintended consequences of prison reform;Journal of Law, Economics and Organization,2014

4. Transforming Rehabilitation: organizational bifurcation and the end of probation as we knew it?;Probation Journal,2016

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. What are prison offender managers’ experiences of delivering New Me MOT?;The Journal of Forensic Practice;2024-07-22

2. ‘Patience, persistence and proportionality’: Probation officer's perspectives of desistance in practice;Probation Journal;2024-03-12

3. Fairness, relationships and perceptions of police legitimacy in the context of integrated offender management;Policing and Society;2023-10-09

4. Old habits die hard;Integrated Offender Management and the Policing of Prolific Offenders;2023-03-20

5. Fairness and legitimacy within integrated offender management;Integrated Offender Management and the Policing of Prolific Offenders;2023-03-20

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3