Maintaining AACSB international accreditation: from basics to best practices

Author:

McIntyre Faye S.,Gilbert Faye W.

Abstract

Purpose A truly successful continuous improvement review (CIR) visit does more than merely check the boxes for a positive recommendation. It builds the story of the school and should be an opportunity for its culture to shine through. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how to facilitate a successful CIR visit by moving from the basics of accreditation to understanding, implementing and “living” best practices. Design/methodology/approach Short tenure and high turnover among business school deans, mean that the majority of those leading the CIR may have no previous experience with the process. Findings This study begins by providing an overview of the role of accreditation and the role of the dean in the accreditation process. With a combined experience of over 35 years in the dean role and having served on or chaired over 35 accreditation visits, the authors share their experiences and offer a seven-step process for understanding and implementing best practices in the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business accreditation process. Originality/value The suggestions offered in this study should help schools enhance long-term positive outcomes and serve as a guide to those navigating the CIR process.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Education,Business and International Management

Reference33 articles.

1. What it means to be dean;AACSB.,2015

2. AACSB. (2016). AACSB 2014-2015 deans survey. Retrieved from: www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/research/data%20downloads/deans-survey-infographic-2014.ashx?la=en

3. AACSB. (2018). Deans survey 2017-18 infographic. Retrieved from: www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/images/charts%20and%20graphs/data/deans%20and%20administrators/deans_infographic.ashx?la=en

4. AACSB. (2019). Continuous improvement review handbook for joint business and accounting. Retrieved from: www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/journey/business/continuous-review

5. AACSB. (2020a). 2020 Guiding principles and standards for business accreditation. Retrieved from: www.aacsb.edu/-/media/aacsb/docs/accreditation/business/standards-and-tables/2020%20business%20accreditation%20standards.ashx?la=en&hash=E4B7D8348A6860B3AA9804567F02C68960281DA2

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Modeling the enablers of AACSB implementation in business schools: ISM-Fuzzy MICMAC analysis;Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education;2023-11-14

2. Assurance of learning in business education – what exactly are we assuring, and whose business should it be?;Quality Assurance in Education;2023-07-12

3. Faculty's subjective well-being: insights from a Mexican business school;Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal;2022-12-16

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3