Abstract
PurposeThis paper aims to offer a commentary on Psychologically Informed Services: A Good Practice Guide, a recently published operational guidance document on developing psychologically informed environments (PIEs) in services for homeless people.Design/methodology/approachThe paper is an invited opinion piece and comment, based on the specialist experience and viewpoint of the author as a rehabilitation psychiatrist, a medical historian of the therapeutic community movement, and a member of the “enabling environments” development group.FindingsThe new operational guidance is welcomed, with some provisos. Specifically, the author is concerned that, in the prevailing commissioning culture, and the individual pathology‐based presumptions of the “medical model”, a focus on the “psychological” may be taken to mean a stress on individual psychology and therapeutic techniques derived from individual therapy. This may distract attention from the need to work with the whole social environment, with peer support and with recognition of the importance of informal interactions, as opportunities for growth, if services are to work with the whole person.Originality/valueServices that wish to develop as PIEs need to take care to work with the whole person, and their social selves, and to develop enabling environments that recognise and work with the importance of all relationships.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference5 articles.
1. Buber, M. (2004), I and Thou, Continuum International Publishing Group, London.
2. Haigh, R., Harrison, T., Johnson, R., Paget, S. and Williams, S. (2012), “Psychologically informed environments and the ’enabling environments’ initiative”, Housing, Care and Support, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 34‐42.
3. Johnson, R. and Haigh, R. (2011), “Social psychiatry and social policy for the 21st century: new concepts for new needs – the ‘enabling environments’ initiative”, Mental Health and Social Inclusion, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 17‐23.
4. Manning, N. (1976), “Values and practice in the therapeutic community”, Human Relations, Vol. 29, pp. 125‐38.
5. Rose, N. (1998), Inventing Ourselves: Psychology, Power and Personhood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献