Author:
Lin Joung-Yol,Batmunkh Munkh-Ulzii John,Moslehpour Massoud,Lin Chuang-Yuang,Lei Ka-Man
Abstract
Purpose
Since the 2008 financial crisis, the USA has three times implemented quantitative easing (QE) policy. The results of the policy, however, were far below all expectations. Furthermore, it flooded emerging markets (EMs) with low-priced dollars. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the overall and individual impacts of the policy on EMs.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses panel data regression model together with the fixed effects model. Also, a unit root test is conducted to check stationary properties of the data, as well as Durbin-Watson statistic to check serial correlation issues in the models. In estimating empirical models, this paper employs macroeconomic data set of stock market returns, exchange rates, lending interest rates, consumer price index, monetary aggregates and foreign exchange reserves from seven diversified emerging economies. The EMs in this study include China, Indonesia, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Russia and Brazil. The time period undertaken in this study is from 2008 to 2012. In order to measure impacts of the different stages of the policy, the authors use dummy variables to represent each stage of the policy.
Findings
The results of the study show that the QE policy has significant impacts on foreign exchange reserves, foreign exchange markets and stock markets of the sample economies. Domestic credit markets, however, appear to be least influenced field by the policy. Finally, the results show that only the first stage of the policy exhibits strong significant impacts, however, leverage of the policy decreases over time.
Research limitations/implications
Further studies may use different samples, also variables that measure foreign capital inflows such as changes in financial accounts, foreign direct investment and foreign portfolio investment.
Originality/value
The present study has the following contributions on assessing the impacts of QE policy. First, the overall and individual impacts of the policy are analyzed. Second, in order to establish more valid results, the sample of this study is designed to include several EMs from three continents and diverse regions.
Reference49 articles.
1. Sovereign risk premium and divergent fiscal policies in a monetary union;Revue d'économie Politique,2014
2. Modeling liquidity management for Indian FMCG firms;International Journal of Commerce and Management,2014
3. Long memory, economic policy uncertainty and forecasting US inflation: a Bayesian VARFIMA approach;Applied Economics,2017
4. Macroeconomic cycles and the stock market's reaction to monetary policy;Journal of Banking & Finance,2008
5. Bernanke, B. (2011), “Testimony: the economic outlook and monetary and fiscal policy”, available at: www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/testimony/bernanke20110209a.htm (accessed August 30, 2015).
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献