Quantitative analysis of viable systems model on software projects in the ICT sector in Castilla y León

Author:

Puche Regaliza Julio César

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to detect the degree of influence between applying the Viable Systems Model (VSM), developed by Stafford Beer, on a software project and its viability or success. Design/methodology/approach – The authors performed a quantitative analysis in which it was necessary to identify theoretical constructs of the VSM (Systems One to Five) and of the viability or success of the software project, measuring each of the indicators together. These indicators have been included in a questionnaire or standardised measurement tool, which was subsequently used for data collection by a number of companies in the information and communications technology sector in Castilla y León. The obtained data served as the basis for a number of results through the definition of a structural equation model. Findings – The results support the particular importance of Systems One and Four in a software project. In other words, software projects need to clearly define their operational elements (e.g. organisational units, business units, working environments, and working teams) and the relationships that appear between them. Additionally, in software projects it is necessary to determine the appropriate prevention actions to be able to observe the changes that take place in their environment and thus make decisions that allow the project to adapt to these changes. Originality/value – The originality is based on the VSM application in software projects organisation. The value is based on VSM formalisation and practical application, to overcome the criticism about its abstract nature.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Computer Science (miscellaneous),Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Theoretical Computer Science,Control and Systems Engineering,Engineering (miscellaneous)

Reference56 articles.

1. Adam, M. (2001), “Lebensfähigkeit sozialer Systeme: Satafford Beer’s Viable System Model im Vergleich”, dissertation Universität St Gallen Difo-Druck Verlag, Bamberg.

2. Albers, S. and Hildebrandt, L. (2006), “Methodische Probleme bei der Erfolgsfaktorenforschung: Messfehler, formative versus reflektive Indikatoren und die Wahl des Strukturgleichungs Modells”, ZfbF No. 58, Februar Ausgabe, pp. 2-33.

3. Bachmann, M. and Michel, D. (2001), Das Pentagramm der Komplexitätsbewältigung: Management Kybernetik am Beispiel des Schweizer Paraplegiker-Zentrums Nottwil , Verlag Paraplegie, Schweizer Paraplegiker-Stiftung, Basel.

4. Backhaus, K. , Erichson, B. , Plinke, W. and Weiber, R. (2006), Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung , 11 Auflage, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

5. Bagozzi, R.P. , Yi, Y. and Phillips L.W. (1991), “Assessing construct validity in organizational research”, Administrative Science Quarterly , Vol. 36 No. 3, pp. 421-458.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3