Author:
Weydner-Volkmann Sebastian,Feiten Linus
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to defend the notion of “trust in technology” against the philosophical view that this concept is misled and unsuitable for ethical evaluation. In contrast, it is shown that “trustworthy technology” addresses a critical societal need in the digital age as it is inclusive of IT-security risks not only from a technical but also from a public layperson perspective.
Design/methodology/approach
From an interdisciplinary perspective between philosophy andIT-security, the authors discuss a potential instantiation of a “trustworthy information and communication technology (ICT)”: a solution for privacy respecting video surveillance. Here, strong data protection measures address grave concerns such as the threat of bulk biometric tracking of citizens. In a logical argument, however, the authors show that this technical notion of “trust” needs to be complemented by interlocking trust relations to justify public trust.
Findings
Based on this argument, the authors demonstrate that the philosophical position considering “trust in technology” to denote either “reliability” or “interpersonal trust” is too limited as it fails to address critical aspects of IT-security. In a broader, socio-technical sense, however, it is shown that several distinct accounts of trust – technical, interpersonal and institutional – should meaningfully interlock, to address concerns with ICTs.
Originality/value
This conceptual study demonstrates the potential of “trust in technology” for a more comprehensive evaluation of ICTs within the context of operation. Furthermore, it adds to the discussion of trust in IT-security by highlighting the layperson’s challenge of judging a technology’s trustworthiness. Vice versa, it contributes to Ethics of Technology by highlighting crucial IT-security needs.
Subject
Computer Networks and Communications,Sociology and Political Science,Philosophy,Communication
Reference45 articles.
1. AI HLEG (2019), “Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI”, Bruxelles: High level expert group on artificial intelligence, available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
2. Trust and antitrust;Ethics,1986
3. The sorcerer’s apprentice guide to fault attacks;Proceedings of the IEEE,2006
4. Big Brother Award (2005), “Technology: video surveillance”, BigBrotherAwards.de. 2005, available at: https://bigbrotherawards.de/en/2005/technology-video-surveillance
5. Gründe für Vertrauen, Vertrauenswürdigkeit und Kompetenz;Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie,2016
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献