Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to understand the nature of leadership development (LD) methods adopted by companies operating in Syria by exploring the content, purpose, and the implantation of LD methods.
Design/methodology/approach
– Middle and top managers were asked via semi-structured interviews to describe the content, purposes, and implementation of LD practices.
Findings
– The findings revealed that the LD interventions are mixed between experiential learning and self and team analysis. Specifically, five major methods or activities used in Syria: action learning, coaching, feedback, rotation, and networking. These methods and activities were not only used for a specific purpose, but also for multiple purposes.
Research limitations/implications
– Research data were conducted during what was called the Arab Spring, which has negative implications not only on the participants, but also on the way they responded to questions. In addition, the for-profit sector was only involved in the study because of its flexibility, lack of bureaucracy, and the application of LD.
Originality/value
– This study is the only study that investigated LD methods and activities in Syria.
Subject
Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Reference97 articles.
1. Abdalla, I.
and
Al-Homoud, M.
(1995), “A survey of management training and development practices in the State of Kuwait”,
Journal of Management Development
, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 14-25.
2. Alimo-Metcalfe, B.
(1998), “360 degree feedback and leadership development”,
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 35-44.
3. Andersson, M.
and
Thornqvist, C.
(2007), “Regional clusters of communication: between national and European identities”, in
Whittal, M.
and
Knudsen, H.
(Eds),
Towards a European Labour Identity: The Case of the European Work Council
, Routledge, Oxfordshire, pp. 94-110.
4. Atwater, L.
,
Brett, J.F.
and
Charles, A.C.
(2007), “Multisource feedback: lessons learned and implications for practice”,
Human Resource Management
, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 285-307.
5. Barnett, M.L.
(2005), “Giving credits where credit’s not due?”,
Academy of Management Learning & Education
, Vol. 4 No. 2, pp. 221-228.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献