Abstract
This article explicates a conceptual framework that might be used to study how fanatical managers make decisions. It reviews literature on fanatics produced by psychologists, sociologists, cultural theorists, political scientists, theologians, and marketers, and then places their multidisciplinary insights into a management context. It identifies two familiar features of fanatics – intensity and intolerance – but suggests that a third feature – incoherence between thinking, behaviour and goals – might be the conceptual key to understanding fanatical managers, measuring their fanaticism and interpreting their management decision making. This conceptual framework may also assist the chaos, complexity and non‐linear movements in management research as well as practitioners who want an easy‐to‐understand template against which to evaluate their planning, thinking and managerial behaviour.
Subject
Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference108 articles.
1. Arnold, J., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. and Drasgow, F. (2000), “The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 249‐69.
2. Ashforth, B. and Kreiner, G. (2002), “Normalizing emotion in organizations: making the extraordinary seem ordinary”, Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 215‐35.
3. Barringer, B. and Bluedorn, A. (1999), “The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 421‐44.
4. Bass, B.M. (1985), Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations, Free Press, New York, NY.
5. Bass, B. (1990), Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research and Management Applications, Free Press, New York, NY.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献