The importance of capabilities for strategic direction and performance

Author:

O’Regan Nicholas,Ghobadian Abby

Abstract

This paper re‐visits the perennial question “Why do some firms perform better than others?” by focusing on the resource‐based view of strategy and in particular the role of generic organisational capabilities in the achievement of overall performance and competitive advantage. Presents findings based on data collected from 194 manufacturing small to medium‐sized enterprises. The analysis confirms the authors’ contention that generic organisational capabilities have a positive impact on strategy deployment and on the achievement of overall performance. The findings indicate that generic capabilities enable firms to manage for the future by focussing on customer’s needs and requirements, while at the same time managing crises and problems arising in their operating environment. A further analysis comparing the emphasis on generic capabilities by both high and low performing firms found that high‐performing firms emphasised capabilities to a far greater extent than low‐performing firms. This implies that generic capability is one of the main drivers of performance. The analysis suggests that firms seeking high overall performance would be well advised to ensure that they actively consider their generic capabilities as the basis of their strategic direction. In short, alignment of the generic capabilities and strategic planning is a prerequisite for high performance.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Management Science and Operations Research,General Business, Management and Accounting

Reference89 articles.

1. Amit, R. and Schoemaker, P. (1993), “Strategic assets and organizational rent”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 33‐46.

2. Andersen, H., Cobbled, I. and Lawrie, G. (2001), “Balanced scorecard implementation in SMEs: reflection on literature and practice”, in Proceedings of the SME Conference, Aalborg, pp. 103‐12.

3. Asch, D. and Salaman, G. (2002), “The challenge of change”, European Business Journal, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 133‐43.

4. Avolio, B., Yammarino, F.J. and Bass, B.M. (1991), “Identifying common methods variance with data collected from a single source: an unresolved sticky issue”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 571‐87.

5. Barnett, W. and Burgelman, R. (1996), “Evolutionary perspectives on strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 5‐19.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3