Author:
Søndenaa Erik,Whittington Richard,Lauvrud Christian,Nonstad Kåre
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine and compare levels of burnout, traumatic stress and resilience amongst Norwegian nursing care staff in two intellectual disability (ID) services.
Design/methodology/approach
– This was a cross-sectional survey in which 137 staff completed questionnaires measuring work-related stress, burnout, compassion and resilience. Two groups were compared; staff in the national forensic ID services and staff in the community ID caring services.
Findings
– Nursing staff in the community ID caring services had significantly more signs of stress and burnout compared to the other group. At the same time they were more compassionate.
Originality/value
– The different caring cultures examined in this study indicated that the forensic ID staff tended to focus on the physical aspects of the caring role whilst the community ID staff tended to focus on the relational issues. The impact of serious events resulted in a higher level of stress and burnout symptoms, however the community carers showed more compassion to their work.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Phychiatric Mental Health,Pathology and Forensic Medicine
Reference40 articles.
1. Allen, D.
(1989), “The effects of deinstitutionalisation on people with mental handicaps: a review”,
Mental Handicap Research
, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 18-37.
2. Asukai, N.
,
Kato, H.
,
Kawamura, N.
,
Kim, Y.
,
Yamamoto, K.
,
Kishimoto, J.
,
Miyake, Y.
and
Nishizono-Maher, A.
(2002), “Reliability and validity of the Japanese-language version of the impact of event scale-revised (IES-RJ): four studies of different traumatic events”,
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
, Vol. 190 No. 3, pp. 175-82.
3. Bartone, P.
(2007), “Test-retest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale-15, a brief hardiness scale”,
Psychological reports
, Vol. 101 No. 3, pp. 943-44.
4. Bromley, J.
and
Emerson, E.
(1995), “Beliefs and emotional reactions of care staff working with people with challenging behaviour”,
Journal of Intellectual Disability Research
, Vol. 39, pp. 341-52.
5. Brunet, A.
,
St-Hilaire, A.
,
Jehel, L.
and
King, S.
(2003), “Validation of a French version of the impact of event scale-revised”,
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie
, Vol. 48, p. 56.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献