A measurement instrument for the “ten principles of good BPM”

Author:

Badakhshan PeymanORCID,Scholta HendrikORCID,Schmiedel Theresa,vom Brocke JanORCID

Abstract

PurposeThe ten principles of good business process management (BPM) support organizations in planning and scoping the organizations' BPM approach. Derived from literature and expert panels, the principles received much attention both in research and practice. This article develops a measurement instrument to operationalize the principles and to support organizations in measuring the degree to which they incorporate the principles in their BPM approach, that way advancing their BPM capabilities.Design/methodology/approachThe authors applied the scale-development methodology, because this methodology is an established approach consisting of various techniques to develop measurement instruments. First, the authors used established techniques to develop such an instrument. Then, the authors assessed the validity and reliability of the developed instrument through a field survey with 345 participants.FindingsThe authors developed a valid and reliable measurement instrument for the ten principles of good BPM. The field survey's results reveal that the measurement instrument meets all required methodological standards. The instrument, thus, can be applied to help process owners and managers to evaluate their BPM approach and plan future actions based on potential shortcomings. Future research can both use and further develop the instrument, which serves as a conceptualization of the principles.Originality/valueThis study is the first to provide a measurement instrument for assessing an organizations' BPM practice against the ten principles of good BPM, which have become established as a much-considered and widely-used source of reference both in academia and practice. The authors also discuss how the instrument compares to and distinguishes from existing approaches to qualify BPM approaches, thus communicating the significance of the instrument.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous),Business and International Management

Reference97 articles.

1. Abbott, C., Bandara, W., French, E., Tate, M. and Mathiesen, P. (2021), “A stakeholder engagement model for process improvement initiatives”, in Polyvyanyy, A., Wynn, M.T., Van Looy, A. and Reichert, M. (Eds), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Business Process Management, Springer, Rome, pp. 455-472.

2. Alibabaei, A., Bandara, W. and Aghdasi, M. (2009), “Means of achieving business process management success factors”, in Pouloudi, N., Pramatari, K. and Poulymenakou, A. (Eds), Proceedings of the 4th Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems, Athens University of Economics & Business, Athens, pp. 1348-1363.

3. The role of culture in business process management initiatives;Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences,2010

4. Studying BPM success factors differences in various industries;International Journal of Management and Computing Sciences,2017

5. Business process management: a maturity assessment of Saudi Arabian organizations;Business Process Management Journal,2016

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3