Author:
Rudko Ihor,Bashirpour Bonab Aysan,Fedele Maria,Formisano Anna Vittoria
Abstract
Purpose
This study, a theoretical article, aims to introduce new institutionalism as a framework through which business and management researchers can explore the significance of artificial intelligence (AI) in organizations. Although the new institutional theory is a fully established research program, the neo-institutional literature on AI is almost non-existent. There is, therefore, a need to develop a deeper understanding of AI as both the product of institutional forces and as an institutional force in its own right.
Design/methodology/approach
The authors follow the top-down approach. Accordingly, the authors first briefly describe the new institutionalism, trace its historical development and introduce its fundamental concepts: institutional legitimacy, environment and isomorphism. Then, the authors use those as the basis for the queries to perform a scoping review on the institutional role of AI in organizations.
Findings
The findings reveal that a comprehensive theory on AI is largely absent from business and management literature. The new institutionalism is only one of many possible theoretical perspectives (both contextually novel and insightful) from which researchers can study AI in organizational settings.
Originality/value
The authors use the insights from new institutionalism to illustrate how a particular social theory can fit into the larger theoretical framework for AI in organizations. The authors also formulate four broad research questions to guide researchers interested in studying the institutional significance of AI. Finally, the authors include a section providing concrete examples of how to study AI-related institutional dynamics in business and management.
Reference76 articles.
1. Neo-Institutional theory and organization studies: a mid-life crisis?;Organization Studies,2018
2. Toward an ethics of algorithms: convening, observation, probability, and timeliness;Science, Technology, and Human Values,2016
3. Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences: Journalism’s vision of its public in an age of audience transparency;International Journal of Communication,2011
4. Barkanov, B. (2016), “Institutionalism”, Encyclopedia Britannica, available at: www.britannica.com/topic/institutionalism
5. A review and a proposal about socio-economic impacts of artificial intelligence,2021