Persistence of profitability in top firms: does it vary across sectors?

Author:

Bhangu Parneet Kaur

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze variations in the degree of persistence of profitability across diverse economic sectors and industry groups over the time period of 1990-2014 for a sample of top publically listed firms belonging to a selected set of developed and developing economies. Design/methodology/approach Degree of profit persistence has been estimated using Mueller’s (1990) autoregressive methodology. Firms were classified into different economic sectors and industry groups as per the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). The examination of inter-sectoral variations in profit persistence has been performed by comparing mean values of estimated short-run and long-run profit persistence parameter for all firms and between firms belonging to the developed and developing countries, respectively. Findings Firms in consumer staples, consumer discretionary and health care enjoy persistent above the norm returns, unlike firms in traditional industries, utilities and energy sectors, which are characterized by low persistence and below the norm returns. A high degree of profit persistence is observed in health care and idea- and technology-intensive sector in the developed countries; however, in the developing countries, profits persist higher in consumer discretionary and capital-intensive telecommunication services sectors. Originality/value The study provides a holistic examination of inter-sectoral variations in profit persistence of top firms in developed and developing economies using a uniform methodology and data set. It can serve as an aid to the competition commissions and anti-trust regulatory authorities to formulate policies for curtailing anti-competitive activities in certain sectors.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management

Reference38 articles.

1. Abbosh, O. Nunes, P. Savic, V. and Moore, M. (2017), “The big squeeze: how compression threatens old industries”, MIT Sloan Management Review, available at: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/the-big-squeeze-how-compression-threatens-old-industries/ (accessed 12 September 2017).

2. American Antitrust Institute (2016), “A national competition policy: unpacking the problem of declining competition and setting priorities moving forward”, available at: www.antitrustinstitute.org/sites/default/files/AAINatlCompPolicy.pdf (accessed 3 January 2018).

3. The persistence of profits, sectoral heterogeneity and firms’ characteristics;International Journal of the Economics of Business,2009

4. Bertelsen, M. and Sedlacek, M. (2014), “Energy sector overview”, working paper, Washington State University, Washington, DC, 18 February, available at: https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/606/2015/02/SectorOverview_ENE_Spring2014.pdf (accessed 5 July 2017).

5. Centre for American Progress (2016), “Reviving antitrust why our economy needs a progressive competition policy”, available at: https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/06/28143212/RevivingAntitrust.pdf (accessed 7 March 2018).

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3