Author:
Muthusamy Senthil,Dass Parshotam
Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to trace the emergence of knowledge-centric innovative enterprises that function in a disaggregated and dispersed form and further contemplate the economic and managerial rationale behind this strategy. A constant challenge to large organizations as well as those pursuing the intent to grow bigger is how to sustain the innovative dynamism.
Design/methodology/approach
– The authors review the evolution of disaggregated and dispersed enterprises and discuss the changing cost structures for transactions, integration and coordination in the global knowledge economy. They elaborate the benefits of scale reduction and dispersed operations with examples.
Findings
– Their review of the extant practices suggests that managers are finding value in disaggregating the firm operations. Disaggregation enhances the firm agility and responsiveness and helps the firm exploit the fleeting opportunities without incurring the opportunity cost or risking high investment.
Practical implications
– Corporations need to become nimble, and their structure should be networked and permeable with significant industry actors. Integration would be imprudent if there is huge sunk cost due to uncertainty in business. Scale reduction and disaggregation, and operating in a dispersed mode – like a shoaling form – would help the companies exploit the fleeting opportunities without incurring the opportunity cost and risking high investment.
Originality/value
– In addition to reviewing the rise of disaggregated enterprises, we explore the economic and managerial rationale of the disaggregation strategy, and discuss the learning and innovation, investment and cost-related advantages that stem from the disaggregated form of organization.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Business and International Management
Reference131 articles.
1. Adler, P.S.
(1995), “Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: the case of the design/ manufacturing interface”, Organization Science, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 147-167.
2. Adler, P.S.
(2001), “Market, hierarchy, and trust: The knowledge economy and the future of capitalism”, Organization Science, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 215-234.
3. Adler, R.W.
and
Hiromoto, T.
(2012), “Amoeba management: lessons from Japan’s Kyocera”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 83-89.
4. Aeppel, T.
(2006), “A hot commodities market spurs buying spree by manufacturers”, Wall Street Journal, New York, NY, 14 August, A.1.
5. Alfaro, L.
,
Conconi, P.
,
Fadinger, H.
and
Newman, A.F.
(2012), “Do prices determine vertical integration? Evidence from trade policy”, Working Paper No. 10-060, Harvard Business School BGIE Unit, Boston, MA.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献