Author:
Kreilkamp Niklas,Schmidt Maximilian,Wöhrmann Arnt
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to investigate if and how firms approach debiasing and what determines its success. In particular, this study examines if debiasing is effective in reducing cognitive decision biases. This paper also investigates organizational characteristics that determine the effectiveness of debiasing.
Design/methodology/approach
This study uses survey data from German firms to answer the research questions. Target respondents are individuals in a senior management accounting function.
Findings
In line with the hypotheses, this paper finds that debiasing can reduce cognitive biases. Moreover, this study finds that psychological safety not only directly influences the occurrence of cognitive biases but is also an important factor that determines the effectiveness of debiasing.
Research limitations/implications
This paper provides evidence that debiasing can serve as a powerful management accounting tool and discusses debiasing in the context of recent management accounting literature. This study also adds to the stream of research that investigates the role of psychological safety in organizations by highlighting its importance for successful debiasing.
Practical implications
This paper informs firms that use or intend to use debiasing about crucial determinants to consider when debating its implementation, i.e. psychological safety. This study also identifies risk management as a potential interface for the implementation of systematic debiasing.
Originality/value
While previous research primarily addresses specific cognitive biases and debiasing mechanisms using lab experiments, this is – to the best of the knowledge – the first study investigating cognitive biases and debiasing on a broad conceptual level using survey data.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Accounting,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference88 articles.
1. Costs and benefits of judgement errors;Psychological Bulletin,1991
2. Two methods of reducing overconfidence;Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1987
3. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys;Journal of Marketing Research,1977
4. A descriptive study of information evaluation;Journal of Accounting Research,1981
5. The business logic in debiasing;McKinsey on Risk,2017
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献