Abstract
Purpose
– The purpose of this paper is to examine the main and indirect effects of belongingness and interactional fairness on interpersonal citizenship behavior.
Design/methodology/approach
– Field data were obtained from 141 subordinate-supervisor dyads from diverse occupations and organizations within Canada. The study was cross-sectional in nature.
Findings
– Consistent with expectations the findings demonstrates that interactional fairness positively predicts employee sense of belongingness, and employees show more helping behavior (supervisor rated) when they have a stronger sense of belongingness at work. Belongingness partially mediates the relationship between interactional fairness and interpersonal behavior.
Research limitations/implications
– Future research could involve investigating a broader range of mediating mechanisms that might promote interpersonal citizenship behavior; for example, trust. As previously indicated, belongingness partially mediates the relationship between interactional fairness and interpersonal citizenship behavior, implying other possible mechanisms through which interactional fairness influences follower behaviors. Moreover, this research can be extended to include to other forms of prosocial behaviors (e.g. innovative behavior).
Practical implications
– Satisfying employees’ need for belonging is an important aspect of organizational life and useful in promoting helping behaviors among coworkers, it is essential for organizations to, therefore, create a work culture of inclusiveness. It is prudent for organizations to also expend greater effort to maximize interactional fairness by introducing programs intended for training organizational leaders how to be fair.
Originality/value
– Interpersonal citizenship behavior is important for group and organizational functioning; however, current psychological models are insufficient for understanding these behaviors. To advance the understanding, this study attempts to directly test individuals’ sense of belongingness as the psychological mechanism through which interactional justice can influence interpersonal citizenship behavior.
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
Reference90 articles.
1. Ambrose, M.L.
and
Schminke, M.
(2003), “Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 295-305.
2. Anderson, S.E.
and
Williams, L.J.
(1996), “Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81 No. 3, pp. 282-296.
3. Ashforth, B.E.
and
Mael, F.
(1989), “Social identity theory and the organization”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 20-39.
4. Barclay, D.
,
Higgins, C.
and
Thompson, R.
(1995), “The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling, personal computer adaptation and use as an illustration”, Technology Studies, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 285-309.
5. Baron, R.M.
and
Kenny, D.A.
(1986), “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51 No. 6, pp. 1173-1182.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献