Government-funded event organisations – good and bad practice

Author:

Devine Adrian,Devine Frances

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine how the structure of government-funded event agencies affected the development of the events industry in Northern Ireland. The institutional arrangements for two agencies which operated at different times in Northern Ireland were analysed. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 62 in-depth interviews were conducted with event organisers and public officials who had worked directly with these two organisations. Findings – The standalone National Events Agency which began operating in 1999 was found to be more hands-on and worked closely with event organisers to develop the quality of their event. As a quango it worked at arms length from government. Unfortunately it abused this freedom and used public monies to manage its own events, highlighting the need for transparency and accountability when managing this type of agency. In 2008 it was replaced by an Events Unit which was set up within the National Tourism Organisation. Under this structure event tourism and not event development was the priority. For the events industry this created development issues and reduced its clout at government level. Originality/value – This paper addressed a gap in the literature and found that the institutional arrangements did affect how a government-funded events agency operated and what it regarded as a strategic priority. This in turn had repercussions for the development of the events industry.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

General Business, Management and Accounting,Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management

Reference40 articles.

1. Allen, J. , O’Toole, W. , McDonnell, I. and Harris, R. (2011), Festival and Special Event Management , 5th ed., Wiley, Chichester.

2. Andre, R. (2010), “Assessing the accountability of government-sponsored enterprises and quangos”, Journal of Business Ethics , Vol. 97 No. 1, pp. 271-289.

3. Baum, T. (1995), “Ireland – the Peace Dividend”, Insights, July 9-14, pp. 2-4.

4. Birrell, D. (2008), “Devolution and quangos in the United Kingdom: the implementation of principles and polices for rationalization and democratization”, Policy Studies , Vol. 29 No. 10, pp. 35-49.

5. Bowdin, G. , McDonnell, I. , Allen, J. and O’Toole, W. (2011), Events Management , 3rd ed., Butterworth Heinemann, London.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Management of a Government-Hosted Festival from Stakeholders’ Perspectives: International Manisa Mesir Paste Festival;Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR);2022-04-13

2. Experiencing Event Management During the Coronavirus Pandemic: A Public Sector Perspective;Frontiers in Sports and Active Living;2022-01-10

3. Stress als Herausforderung in der Eventindustrie;Eventpsychologie;2020-12-15

4. Changing management strategies of a government-hosted festival;International Journal of Event and Festival Management;2019-09-18

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3