How employees learn about corporate strategy

Author:

Al‐Ghamdi Salem M.,Roy Matthew H.,Ahmed Zafar U.

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to assess which communication channels are most frequently used by employees to gain corporate strategic information and the impact of seniority on communication channel chosen.Design/methodology/approachA Saudi Arabian manufacturing company employing a wide range of both professionals and rank and file workers was used as the source of data. A total of 187 responses (85 per cent response rate) to an empirical questionnaire provided the data for analysis.FindingsThere are indications that employees are not satisfied with what they currently know and are eager to learn more about strategic direction. Results also show that rich communication channels such as one‐on‐one dialog and group meetings are preferred to lean ones such as bulletin boards, memos, and newsletters. Finally, more experienced employees utilize a wider variety of communication channels in garnering strategic information.Research limitations/implicationsFindings may not be generalizable to other populations or other companies within the same population.Practical implicationsPracticing managers need to consider the communication sources for strategic information. Further efforts must be made to maximize the communication of strategic intent through the use of rich communication channels for all employees.Originality/valuePresently there is little research explaining the importance of different communication mechanisms for the transference of strategic information. This research fills that void as it shows the relationship between employee tenure and communication mechanism used to understand strategic direction. This research shows that practicing managers should use rich communication channels (face‐to‐face or group meetings) when communicating strategic intent.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference35 articles.

1. Alexander, L. (1985), “Successfully implementing strategic decisions”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 91‐7.

2. Alexander, L. (1994), “Communicating a firm's strategy to employees: an empirical analysis”, unpublished paper.

3. Armenadis, A. and Harris, S. (2002), “Crafting a change message to create transformational readiness”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 169‐84.

4. Balogun, J. and Hailey, V. (2003), Exploring Strategic Change, FT/Prentice‐Hall, London.

5. Beer, M. and Eisenstat, R. (2000), “The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning”, Sloan Management Review, Vol. 41, pp. 29‐41.

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3