Chinese ethnicity and values: a country cluster comparison

Author:

Soontiens Werner

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to compare value clusters of people from the same ethnic group living in different circumstances and conditions by describing the conditions and measuring various value dimensions.Design/methodology/approachThe nature of the concept values is teased out, particularly by considering pressures towards convergence and divergence and the validity of scaling values. A brief description of the socio‐economic and cultural environment of the various countries (Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, China) leads into the analysis of data. Collected data were analysed through factor analysis to consider clustering of values and to facilitate comparison.FindingsThe paper indicates that there is a significant overlap between clustered values across different locations, which, however, shows minor differences. The paper implies that ethnicity and cultural heritage determine values more than socio‐economic circumstances.Research limitations/implicationsIt is not an in‐depth analysis of Chinese culture and Chinese values and represents a selected population. Findings are likely to differ when considering an older segment of the population.Practical implicationsThe paper confirms the cultural similarity between people of the same ethnic group yet points out important nuance differences between people of different countries.Originality/valueIn view of the rising importance of China as a world player, this paper sheds light on the notion of “being Chinese” and its subsequent value system amongst ethnic Chinese people in selected countries.

Publisher

Emerald

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Cultural Studies

Reference45 articles.

1. Abbas, A. (1997), Culture and the Politics of Disappearance, Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.

2. Anderson, E. (2000), “Beyond homo economicus: new developments in theories of social norms”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 29 No. 2, Spring, pp. 170‐200.

3. Borroughs, J.E. and Rindfleisch, A. (2002), “Materialism and well‐being: a conflicting values perspective”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 29 No. 3, December, pp. 348‐70.

4. Crask, M., Fox, J.R. and Stout, R.G. (1995), Marketing Research: Principles and Applications, Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

5. Dahl, A.L. (1996), “Spiritual dimensions of sustainable development”, paper presented at a Workshop on Sustainable Development and International Cooperation, Bucharest, Romania, 22‐23 March.

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3